滴灌条件下诱抗剂对向日葵列当田间防治效果的研究

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2024.03.15

Abstract

Abstract: 【Objective】To investigate the prevention and control effect of plant inducible resistance agents on field sunflower broomrapes,and provide a new perspective for the comprehensive prevention and control of sunflower broomrapes.【Methods】The test sites were located in Siziwang Banner,Ulanqab City and Guyang County,Baotou City,Inner Mongolia. The parasitism rate and parasitism degree of sunflower broomrape were assessed at four different time points（20 th July,10 th August,15 th August,and 30 th September） using a drip irrigation system in the field. The treatments included jinmiao target,chitin and Bacillus subtilis,a combination of jinmiao target and chitin and Bacillus subtilis complex,and water as control（CK）. The effects of two plant inducible resistance agents on Orobanehe cumana parasitical sunflower growth indexes and yield were investigated. 【Results】After drip irrigation with jinmiao target alone,the parasitism degrees of sunflower broomrape in both test sites was significantly lower than that of CK（P<0.05）,which were reduced by 2.95,6.27,3.97 and 1.11,4.99,4.08. The plant height and yield of sunflower increased significantly in both sites（P<0.05）. The plant height was increased by 39.15,36.97,20.66 and 22.50 cm. The yield was increased by 892.80 and 984.00 kg/hm²,respectively. After only drip irrigation with chitin and B. subtilis,parasitism degrees increased significantly compared with CK at different time points（P<0.05）. The parasitism degrees of the two test sites increased by 5.71,3.77,1.91 and 1.36,14.12,13.03,respectively. There was no significant difference between CK and other sunflower growth indexes（P>0.05）. After a combination of jinmiao target and chitin and B. subtilis drip irrigation,parasitism rates and parasitism degrees were significantly reduced compared with CK. The parasitism rate decreased by 79.60%,31.80%,19.00% and 36.67%,81.00%,35.67%,respectively. Parasitism degree decreased by 7.25%,9.69%,8.80% and 1.33%,6.01%,5.61%,respectively. Plant height,disc diameter and yield of sunflower were significantly increased compared with CK（P<0.05）. The plant height was increased by 23.08,33.49 and 14.08,11.33 cm,respectively. The disc diameter was increased by 6.18 and 4.44 cm,respectively. The yield was increased by 796.80 and 835.20 kg/hm²,respectively.【Conclusion】The combination of jiaomiao target and drip irrigation can be integrated into the green prevention and control technology system of sunflower broomrapes for effective prevention and control.

Key words: Sunflower broomrape, Drip irrigation, Plant inducible resistance agents, Field prevention and control effect

CLC Number:

S435.655

DUAN Rui, SHI Shenghua, YANG Xu, BAO Tingting, LI Haoyu, LIU Zhida, ZHANG Yukuan, ZHANG Zhiwei, DU Lei, ZHAO Jun. Study on the field prevention and control effects of inducer against sunflower broomrape under drip irrigation condition[J].Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2024, 52(3): 128-134.

References

[1] SHI B X,ZHAO J.Recent progress on sunflower broomrape research in China[J].Oilseeds and Fats Crops and Lipids,2020,27:30.
[2] 王靖,崔超,李亚珍,等.全寄生杂草向日葵列当研究现状与展望[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(5):144-147.
[3] DOR E,PLAKHINE D,JOEL D M,et al.A new race of sunflower broomrape(Orobanche cumana)with a wider host range due to changes in seed response to strigolactones[J].Weed Science,2020,68(2):134-142.
[4] YOSHIDA S,SHIRASU K.Plants that attack plants:Molecular elucidation of plant parasitism[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2012,15(6):708-713.
[5] 吴海荣,强胜.检疫杂草列当(Orobanche L.)[J].杂草科学,2006,24(2):58-60.
[6] 石胜华,柳惠卿,云晓鹏,等.向日葵抗列当水平室内鉴定体系准确性评价及不同品种抗列当水平鉴定[J].杂草学报,2019,37(2):28-34.
[7] 白全江,云晓鹏,高占明,等.内蒙古向日葵列当发生危害及其防治技术措施[J].内蒙古农业科技,2013(1):75-76.
[8] 庞俊峰,马德宁,王德寿,等.向日葵列当生物学特性及抗列当向日葵分子育种研究进展[J].生物技术进展,2012,2(6):391-396.
[9] 云晓鹏,杜磊,白全江,等.植物诱抗剂-IR-18对向日葵列当的抑制效果及应用[J].北方农业学报,2018,46(6):77-82.
[10] 李欢欢. 布尔津县向日葵列当发生规律与预防措施[J].新疆农业科技,2017(3):48.
[11] SLAVOV S,VAN ONCKELEN H,BATCHVAROVA R,et al.IAA production during germination of Orobanche spp. seeds[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,2004,161(7):847-853.
[12] 白全江,云晓鹏,杜磊,等.抗除草剂新品种防除向日葵列当用药技术研究[J].北方农业学报,2018,46(4):77-81.
[13] 陶波,赵旭,杜磊,等.诱抗剂对向日葵抗性诱导的研究[J].北方农业学报,2022,50(3):53-59.
[14] 杨旭,高婧,石必显,等.室内条件下锦苗标靶对番茄埃及列当的防效[J].杂草学报,2023,41(2):49-56.
[15] 付思蕊,王胤,陈雅奇,等.不同植物免疫诱抗剂对番茄的诱抗促生作用研究[J].蔬菜,2023(2):43-48.
[16] 崔华星,王宁,侯敏,等.枯草芽孢杆菌DNKAS对加工番茄分枝列当的防治应用[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(12):105-114.
[17] BARGHOUTHI S,SALMAN M.Bacterial inhibition of Orobanche aegyptiaca and Orobanche cernua radical elongation[J].Biocontrol Science and Technology,2010,20(4):423-435.
[18] 王亚娇,纪莉景,栗秋生,等.多功能列当生防镰刀菌的筛选及种类鉴定[J].中国生物防治学报,2016,32(6):788-793.
[19] 张萍,赵建华,鞠召彬,等.放线菌肥对新疆加工番茄促生、防病增产及列当的防控效果[J].中国蔬菜,2019(2):49-52.
[20] 李智强,姚虞,杨洋,等.“神锄”复合微生物菌肥防治烤烟列当田间试验[J].新农业,2016(7):58-59.
[21] 唐玉清,殷允广.土壤调理剂与微生物功能菌配合施用修复土壤、生物防治列当试验结果与分析[J].新疆农业科技,2015(3):52-54.
[22] 柳慧卿,石胜华,王娜,等.室内条件下氨基酸水溶肥锦苗标靶抑制列当寄生向日葵的研究[J].杂草学报,2019,37(3):53-59.
[23] 侯丽琴,李长松,徐作珽,等.甲壳素诱导黄瓜抗霜霉病初步研究[J].山东农业科学,2011(8):81-83.
[24] 鲁述玲,杨建平.生物菌剂对向日葵列当的抑制效果[J].农村科技,2020(5):27-30.
[25] 崔华星,许俊锋,崔卫东,等.枯草芽孢杆菌DNKAS对分枝列当的防效、安全性及作用机理[J].西北农业学报,2022,31(1):117-122.

Study on the field prevention and control effects of inducer against sunflower broomrape under drip irrigation condition

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	HAO Qi, LIANG Hongwei, WANG Yongqiang, WANG Fugui, CHEN Tianlu, WANG Zhen, BAI Lanfang, WANG Zhigang. Nitrogen nutrition diagnosis of maize under drip irrigation in Tumochuan plain of Inner Mongolia based on critical nitrogen concentration dilution curve [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2024, 52(3): 1-18.
[2]	HAN Yunfei, REN Yongfeng, ZHAO Peiyi, DU Erxiao, ZHAO Zhiyuan, ZHANG Na, LIU Xiaoyue, ZHANG Peng, MIAO Xinyue. Effects of different drip irrigation treatments on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of quinoa [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2024, 52(1): 103-111.
[3]	LIU Xiaoyue, REN Yongfeng, ZHAO Zhiyuan, ZHANG Na, MIAO Xinyue, ZHANG Shu, HAN Yunfei, ZHANG Peng, ZHAO Peiyi. Effects of drip irrigation on water use and yield of quinoa in the north foot of Yinshan Mountains in Inner Mongolia [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 56-63.
[4]	SU Yajie, TIAN Xiaoyan, DU Lei, BAI Quanjiang, LIU Zhida, ZHAO Jun, XU Jiali, DUAN Xiaojun, WU Zhanmin, YUN Xiaopeng. Screening trap crops of sunflower broomrape（Orobanche cumana Wallr.）in Bayannur [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2022, 50(2): 103-109.
[5]	JIN Zhi, CHEN Ruiying, Wulan, GUAN Ting, ZHAO Peirong, JIA Liguo, WU Yunxia. Effects of different water-saving modes on dry matter accumulation,yield and economic benefits of potato in the North Yinshan Mountain [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2020, 48(3): 60-66.
[6]	REN Yongfeng, LU Zhanyuan, NIE Jing, CUI Yan, AN Hao, GAO Yu, ZHAO Peiyi. Effects of pre-seedling drip irrigation on water utilization and yield of potato [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2019, 47(4): 66-72.
[7]	XU Bing;TIAN Delong;LI Zekun;REN Jie;TANG Pengcheng(Institute of Water Resources for Pastoral Area of IWHR,Hohhot 010020,China). Development strategy and storage capacity of drip irrigation with natural lake water in Hetao irrigation district [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2018, 46(6): 44-49.
[8]	ZHAO Na;FENG Junwei;LI Xiaohong;WANG Zijing;MA Jun;LIU Hanjiang;HAO Yunfeng(Bayannur Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences,Linhe 015000,China). Effects of different drip irrigation with special fertilizers on maize growth and yield in Hetao irrigation area [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2018, 46(6): 58-63.
[9]	. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on physical and chemical properties of soil under precision drip irrigation [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2018, 46(2): 51-51.
[10]	. Effects of different water-saving cropping models on maize yield [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2017, 45(4): 30-30.
[11]	. The benefit analysis of water-saving irrigation engineering of new“Four Ten Million Mu”in Inner Mongolia [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2017, 45(3): 62-62.
[12]	. Cost-saving and synergistic function on mechanized technique of potato production in large scale with drip irrigation and demonstration [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2017, 45(2): 66-66.
[13]	. Effect on different irrigation quantity on growth and development and yield of potato under drip irrigation with mulch [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2016, 44(1): 23-23.
[14]	. The cultivation technology procedures of potato with high ridge drip irrigation [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2015, 43(6): 118-118.
[15]	. The key cultural technique of onion with drip irrigation under mulch [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2015, 43(6): 132-132.