放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶片养分含量和化学计量特征的影响

doi:10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2021.06.011

畜牧与饲料科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 56-62.doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2021.06.011

放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶片养分含量和化学计量特征的影响

白柳¹, 崔媛媛¹, 刘倬彤¹, 门欣洋¹, 侯东杰¹, 孙海莲², 王忠武¹

1.内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院草地资源教育部重点实验室,内蒙古呼和浩特 010011;
2.内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010031

收稿日期:2021-08-02 出版日期:2021-11-30 发布日期:2022-01-10
通讯作者: 王忠武（1979—）,男,教授,博士,主要研究方向为草地生态与管理。
作者简介:白柳（1997—）,女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为草地生态与管理。
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区重大科技专项（ZDZX2018020）; 国家自然科学基金项目（31560140,31760143）; 内蒙古自治区科技成果转化项目（2019CG069,2020CG0013）; 国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0500504）; 内蒙古农业大学草地资源教育部重点实验室

Effects of Grazing on Leaf Nutrient Content and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Dominant Plants in Desert Steppe

BAI Liu¹, CUI Yuan-yuan¹, LIU Zhuo-tong¹, MEN Xin-yang¹, HOU Dong-jie¹, SUN Hai-lian², WANG Zhong-wu¹

1. Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources of the Ministry of Education/College of Grassland,Resources and Environment,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010011,China;
2. Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,China

Received:2021-08-02 Online:2021-11-30 Published:2022-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的] 阐明荒漠草原优势植物叶片养分含量对不同放牧强度的响应。[方法] 在内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原的放牧样地上设置4个不同放牧强度的处理：对照（CK）、轻度放牧（LG）、中度放牧（MG）和重度放牧（HG）,载畜率分别为0、0.91、1.82、2.71只羊/hm²。于2020年对荒漠草原优势植物短花针茅（Stipa breviflora）、无芒隐子草（Cleistogenes songorica）、银灰旋花（Convolvulus ammannii）和冷蒿（Artemisia frigida）在不同放牧强度下叶片中的C、N、P浓度进行测定,并对其化学计量特征进行计算。[结果] 与对照区（CK）相比,重度放牧显著（P<0.05）降低了短花针茅和银灰旋花叶片的C浓度;放牧对短花针茅、无芒隐子草、银灰旋花和冷蒿叶片N含量无显著（P>0.05）影响;中度放牧显著（P<0.05）增加了短花针茅和银灰旋花叶片的P浓度,并显著（P<0.05）降低了冷蒿的P浓度;重度放牧显著（P<0.05）降低了银灰旋花的C∶N,短花针茅、银灰旋花和冷蒿的C∶P,以及短花针茅的N∶P。[结论] 放牧改变植物对养分的利用状况,不同植物对相同生境有不同的适应策略。放牧降低荒漠草原优势植物固C能力。长期中度放牧有利于荒漠草原优势植物对N、P的吸收。

关键词: 荒漠草原, 优势植物, 载畜率, 生态化学计量

Abstract: [Objective] To better understand how dominant plants' leaf nutrient content and stoichiometric characteristics respond to varying grazing intensities in the desert steppe. [Method] On the grazing sample plots of Stipa breviflora desert steppe in Inner Mongolia, four treatments with varied grazing intensities were set up: control （CK）, light grazing （LG）, moderate grazing （MG）, and heavy grazing （HG）, with stocking rates of 0, 0.91, 1.82, and 2.71 sheep/hm² respectively. In the year of 2020, under varying grazing intensities, the concentrations of C, N, and P in leaves of domoinant plants Stipa breviflora, Cleistogenes songorica, Convolvulus ammannii and Artemisia frigida were measured, and their stoichiometric properties were calculated.[Result] Compare with CK group, heavy grazing significantly （P<0.05） decreased the leaf C concentration of Stipa breviflora and Convolvulus ammannii. Grazing had no significant （P>0.05） effect on the leaf N content of all four dominant plants tested. Moderate grazing significantly （P<0.05） increased the P concentration in the leaves of Stipa breviflora and Convolvulus ammannii, while significantly （P<0.05） decreased the P concentration of Artemisia frigida. Heave grazing significantly （P<0.05） decreased the C∶N of Convolvulus ammannii, the C∶P of Stipa breviflora, Convolvulus ammannii and Artemisia frigida as well as the N∶P of Stipa breviflora. [Conclusion] Grazing alters plants' nutrient utilization. Different plants have different adaptation strategies to the same habitat. Grazing reduces the C fixation capacity of dominant plants in desert steppe. Long-term moderate grazing promotes the absorption of N and P by dominating plants in desert steppe.

Key words: desert steppe, dominant plants, stocking rates, ecological stoichiometry

中图分类号:

S812.8

白柳, 崔媛媛, 刘倬彤, 门欣洋, 侯东杰, 孙海莲, 王忠武. 放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶片养分含量和化学计量特征的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(6): 56-62.

BAI Liu, CUI Yuan-yuan, LIU Zhuo-tong, MEN Xin-yang, HOU Dong-jie, SUN Hai-lian, WANG Zhong-wu. Effects of Grazing on Leaf Nutrient Content and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Dominant Plants in Desert Steppe[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2021, 42(6): 56-62.

参考文献 28

[1]	沈海花,朱言坤,赵霞,等.中国草地资源的现状分析[J].科学通报,2016,61(2):139-154.
[2]	KANG L,HAN X G,ZHANG Z B,et al.Grassland ecosystems in China:Review of current knowledge and research advancement[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,2007,362(1482):997-1008.
[3]	REN H Y,EVINER V T,GUI W,et al.Livestock grazing regulates ecosystem multifunctionality in semi‐arid grassland[J].Functional Ecology,2018,32(12):2790-2800.
[4]	CHEN L,LING W,SONG X,et al.Towards a mechanistic understanding of the effect that different species of large grazers have on grassland soil N availability[J].Journal of Ecology,2017,106(1):357-366.
[5]	XI L L,LIU Z Y,REN W B,et al.Linking nutrient strategies with plant size along a grazing gradient:Evidence from Leymus chinensis in a natural pasture[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2016,15(5):1132-1144.
[6]	ELSER J J, STERNER W R,GOROKHOVA E,et al.Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems[J].Ecology Letters,2000,3(6):540-550.
[7]	CHENG B,ZHAO Y J,ZHANG W G,et al.The research advances and prospect of ecological stoichiometry[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(6):1628-1637.
[8]	GREBLIUNAS B D,PERRY W L.The role of C∶N∶P stoichiometry in affecting denitrification in sediments from agricultural surface and tile-water wetlands[J].Springerplus,2016(5):359-368.
[9]	贺金生,韩兴国.生态化学计量学:探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):2-6.
[10]	张珂,何明珠,李新荣,等.阿拉善荒漠典型植物叶片碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2014,34(22):6538-6547.
[11]	ELSER J J,BRACKEN M,CLELAND E E,et al.Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems[J].Ecology Letters,2007,10(12):1135-1142.
[12]	HOU D J,GUO K,LIU C C.Asymmetric effects of grazing intensity on macroelements and microelements in grassland soil and plants in Inner Mongolia Grazing alters nutrient dynamics of grasslands[J].Ecology and Evolution,2020,10(16):8916-8926.
[13]	MA W J,LI J,JIMOH S O,et al.Stoichiometric ratios support plant adaption to grazing moderated by soil nutrients and root enzymes[J].Peerj,2019,7:e7047.
[14]	LIANG M,GORNISH E S,MARIOTTE P,et al.Foliar nutrient content mediates grazing effects on species dominance and plant community biomass[J].Rangeland Ecology and Management,2019,72(6):899-906.
[15]	RITCHIE M E,KNOPS T.Herbivore effects on plant and nitrogen dynamics in Oak savanna[J].Ecology,1998,79(1):165-177.
[16]	熊星烁,蔡宏宇,李耀琪,等.内蒙古典型草原植物叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征的季节动态[J].植物生态学报,2020,44(11):1138-1153.
[17]	安钰,安慧,李生兵.放牧对荒漠草原土壤和优势植物生态化学计量特征的影响[J].草业学报,2018,27(12):94-102.
[18]	丁小慧,宫立,王东波,等.放牧对呼伦贝尔草地植物和土壤生态化学计量学特征的影响[J].生态学报,2012,32(15):4722-4730.
[19]	侯东杰,郭柯.典型草原植物养分对生长季不同放牧强度的动态响应[J].草地学报,2021,29(1):141-148.
[20]	贾丽欣,张峰,乔荠蓉,等.放牧强度对荒漠草原无芒隐子草斑块碳氮化学计量特征的影响[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(1):9-16,93.
[21]	陆景. 植物营养学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002:23.
[22]	银晓瑞,梁存柱,王立新,等.内蒙古典型草原不同恢复演替阶段植物养分化学计量学[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):39-47.
[23]	额尔敦花. 荒漠草原3种主要植物形态与氮、磷含量对载畜率的响应[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013.
[24]	白春利. 荒漠草原优势植物养分利用及化学计量特征研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2013.
[25]	杨菁,谢应忠,吴旭东,等.不同种植年限人工苜蓿草地植物和土壤化学计量特征[J].草业学报,2014,23(2):340-345.
[26]	徐沙,龚吉蕊,张梓榆,等.不同利用方式下草地优势植物的生态化学计量特征[J].草业学报,2014,23(6):45-53.
[27]	朴河春,刘丛强,朱书法,等.贵州石灰岩和砂岩地区C4和C3植物营养元素的化学计量对N/P比值波动的影响[J].第四纪研究,2005(5):552-560.
[28]	刘钟龄,王炜,郝敦元,等.内蒙古草原退化与恢复演替机理的探讨[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002(1):84-91.

放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶片养分含量和化学计量特征的影响

Effects of Grazing on Leaf Nutrient Content and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Dominant Plants in Desert Steppe

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卻国萍, 龙金飞, 卫智军, 张勇, 张忠青, 徐生云, 刘瑞霞, 张毅辉, 张晓民, 张新宇. 放牧强度对荒漠草原不同植物功能群数量特征的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2024, 45(1): 71-78.
[2]	杨鼎, 张璞进, 刘欣超, 闫晓红, 常虹, 伊风艳. 基于CiteSpace的荒漠草原群落多样性文献计量学分析[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2024, 45(1): 85-93.
[3]	崔媛媛, 白柳, 王梓晗, 赵宏宇, 宝音贺西格, 李治国, 韩国栋, 王忠武. 模拟降水和不同载畜率对荒漠草原生态系统碳交换的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(6): 50-55.
[4]	卻国萍, 张爽, 吕世杰, 李泽, 卫智军. 放牧强度对荒漠草原建群种短花针茅空间异质性的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(3): 74-80.
[5]	殷国梅, 镡建国, 王晓栋, 万敏, 冀超, 刘思博, 李俊海, 高巧玲, 陈小菲, 慕宗杰, 马春梅. 不同修复措施在退化荒漠草原生态修复中的效果研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(3): 81-85.
[6]	姜晓红, 宝力道, 阿拉腾布力格, 斯琴, 塔拉, 特木尔布和. 不同放牧强度对荒漠草原牧草微量元素和营养成分的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(2): 91-96.
[7]	哈洁, 李治国, 韩国栋. 基于家畜生产优化管理模型的家庭牧场可持续发展研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2021, 42(1): 83-90.
[8]	常虹, 晔薷罕, 刘亚红, 邱晓, 郝丽芬, 乌尼尔, 木兰, 孙海莲. 短花针茅荒漠草原不同放牧强度土壤线虫群落研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2020, 41(3): 28-34.
[9]	刘佳, 卫智军, 张爽, 卻国萍, 李泽. 短花针茅草原主要植物种群与土壤养分对季节调控放牧的响应[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2020, 41(1): 66-72.
[10]	白春利, 赵和平, 师永明, 丁海君, 刘思博. 荒漠草原区“草田轮作”模式及牧草高效种植技术[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2019, 40(8): 47-49.
[11]	王莹,朱国栋,郭娜,王晓楠,张雅楠,李倩倩,王成杰. 内蒙古荒漠草原主要植物营养成分含量及消化率的月动态变化分析[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2019, 40(5): 37-43.
[12]	刘佳, 卫智军, 吕世杰, 张爽, 李泽, 卻国萍. 短花针茅草原主要植物种群及群落特征对放牧强度季节调控的响应[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2019, 40(12): 35-42.
[13]	殷国梅,边继武,张园园,刘思博,薛艳林,李敬忠,张克威,张英,布仁朝古拉,孙林,贾建宇,张建中. 不同放牧率下冷蒿生物量对蒸散的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2018, 39(1): 29-29.
[14]	温超,陈海军,晔薷罕,张璞进,木兰,单玉梅. 荒漠草原生态系统土壤呼吸研究进展[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2016, 37(6): 45-45.
[15]	单玉梅,温超,陈海军,常虹,木兰,张璞进,晔薷罕,孙海莲. 放牧强度对荒漠草原植物种群高度的季节性影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2016, 37(5): 19-19.