7种药剂对番茄灰霉病菌的室内毒力测定及盆栽防效比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-1197.2019.05.13

Journal of Northern Agriculture ›› 2019, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 70-75.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1197.2019.05.13

• Soil and fertilizer·Plant protection • Previous Articles Next Articles

Indoor virulence determination and potted control effect of seven pesticides against Botrytis cinerea of tomato

ZHANG Qingping¹, BI Caili², GONG Jing², ZHAO Cunhu¹, WANG Hui³

1.Institute of Plant Protection,Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,China;
2.College of Horticulrure and Plant Protection,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010019,China;
3.Promotion Station of Agricultural Bureau of Fengzhen City,Fengzhen 012100,China

Received:2019-09-18 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-12-11

Abstract

Abstract: The indoor virulence of Botrytis cinerea was determined by five kinds of chemical fungicides and two kinds of biological fungicides,and the antibacterial effect was compared by the EC₅₀ value and the resistance level of the pathogenic bacteria.The results showed that among the five chemical fungicides,the antibacterial effect of carbendazim and boscalid was the best.The EC₅₀ values were 139.64 μg/mL and 155.96 μg/mL,respectively,which was sensitive to Botrytis cinerea.Among the two biological fungicides,3×10⁸ CFU/g of Trichoderma harzianum had a better antibacterial effect,and the EC₅₀ value was 139.77 μg/mL.The results of the pot experiment also verified that carbendazim and boscalid can better control the occurrence of tomato gray mold.

Key words: Chemical fungicide, Biological fungicide, Tomato gray mold, Indoor virulence determination

CLC Number:

S436.412

ZHANG Qingping, BI Caili, GONG Jing, ZHAO Cunhu, WANG Hui. Indoor virulence determination and potted control effect of seven pesticides against Botrytis cinerea of tomato[J].Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2019, 47(5): 70-75.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.2096-1197.2019.05.13

https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/Y2019/V47/I5/70

References

[1] 陈治芳,王文桥,韩秀英,等. 新杀菌剂对番茄灰霉病菌的室内毒力及田间防效[J].植物保护,2011,37(5):193-195.
[2] 陈凤平,韩平,张真真,等.啶菌噁唑对番茄灰霉病菌的抑菌作用研究[J].农药学学报,2010,12(1):42-48.
[3] 马建英,张小风,王文桥,等.灰葡萄孢霉Botrytis cinerea对啶菌恶唑的敏感性和不同杀菌剂的交互抗性[J].植物保护学报,2009,36(1):61-64.
[4] 姜彩鸽,杨小伟,张怡,等.12种杀菌剂对葡萄灰霉病菌的室内毒力测定[J].宁夏农林科技,2017,58(8):33-35.
[5] 张雅慧,刘海英. 番茄灰霉病及其人工接种抗病性鉴定技术研究[J].内蒙古农业科技,2012(1):63-64.
[6] 韩景红. 防治番茄灰霉病田间药效试验研究[J].农业科技通讯,2018(3):140-142.
[7] 纪军建,张小风,韩秀英,等. 8种杀菌剂对番茄灰霉病菌的毒力及田间番茄灰霉病菌对咯菌腈的敏感性[J].植物保护,2012,38(6):144-146.
[8] 赵建江,韩秀英,张小风,等. 啶酰菌胺和咯菌腈对番茄灰霉病菌不同菌株的毒力(初报)[J].河北农业科学,2010,14(8):139-140.
[9] 胡永红,曹峥,杨文革,等.多效霉素研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2013,41(12):1-4.
[10] 韩盛,杨渡,徐万里,等. 8种生物源和矿物源农药防治加工番茄细菌性斑点病试验[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(11):2258-2261.
[11] 禾丽菲,李晓旭,朱佳美,等.不同杀菌剂对黄瓜靶斑病菌的毒力作用特性比较[J].农药学学报,2018,20(1):25-32.
[12] 张珊珊,白复芹,孟敏,等.黄瓜靶斑病原菌鉴定及室内药剂筛选试验[J]. 农药科学与管理,2013,34(5):61-64.
[13] 杜玉宁,查仙芳,杨金凤,等.宁夏温室黄瓜新病害靶斑病的药剂筛选[J]. 江苏农业科学,2013,41(1):132-133.
[14] 赵建江,路粉,吴杰,等.河北省设施番茄灰霉病菌对啶酰菌胺和咯菌腈的敏感性[J].植物病理学报,2018,48(6):817-821.
[15] 许丰庆,俞兆鹏,顾忠斌,等.4种生物农药对绿色食品设施番茄灰霉病的防治效果[J].甘肃农业,2018(23):38-40.
[16] 黄仙迪,赵驾浩,胡亚萍,等.3亿CFU/g哈茨木霉菌可湿性粉剂防治番茄灰霉病药效试验[J].上海蔬菜,2018(1):53-54.

Indoor virulence determination and potted control effect of seven pesticides against Botrytis cinerea of tomato

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0