畜牧与饲料科学 ›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 130-130.doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2010.03.060

• 药物科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

利福平、硫酸阿米卡星与青链霉素治疗猪呼吸道疾病的疗效比较

陈红英[1] 张隆厚[1] 许国芬[2] 邓以秀[3] 寸现荣[3] 张玉生[4]   

  1. [1]云南省宁蒗县草山饲料工作站,云南宁蒗674300 [2]云南省宁蒗县翠依乡兽医站,云南宁蒗674308 [3]云南省宁蒗县兽医防疫站,云南宁蒗674300 [4]云南省丽江市古城区畜牧局,云南丽江674100
  • 出版日期:2010-03-20 发布日期:2010-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈红英
  • 作者简介:陈红英(1968-),女,畜牧师,主要从事畜牧生产与动物疫病防治工作。

Healing Effect of Rifampicin,Amikacin and Combination of Penicillin and Streptomycin on Porcine Respiratory Diseases

CHEN Hong-ying,ZHANG Long-hou,XU Guo-fen,DENG Yi-xiu,CUN Xian-rong,ZHANG Yu-sheng (1.Grass Feed Workstation of Ninglang County in Yunnan Province,Ninglang 674300,China;2.Cuiyi Veterinary Station of Ninglang County in Yunnan Province,Ninglang 674308,China;3.Veterinary Epidemic Station of Ninglang CountyinYunnan Province,Ninglang 674300,China;4.Animal Husbandry Bureau of Gucheng District of Lijiang City,Lijiang 674100,China)   

  • Online:2010-03-20 Published:2010-03-20

摘要: 试验用利福平、硫酸阿米卡星、青链霉素3种药物对猪的呼吸道疾病进行治疗试验,以探讨利福平、硫酸阿米卡星、青链霉素对猪的呼吸道疾病的治疗效果。试验共分3个不同药物组,治疗1个疗程为4d:Ⅰ组利福平的治愈率为87.1%,治疗有效率为100%。Ⅱ组硫酸阿米卡星的治愈率为34.4%,治疗有效率为87.5%。Ⅲ组青链霉素的治愈率为28.1%,治疗有效率为84.4%。治疗结果经χ^2检验,Ⅰ组与Ⅱ、Ⅲ组组间差异极显著(P〈0.01);Ⅱ组与Ⅲ组组间差异不显著(P〉0.05)。治疗效果,试验Ⅰ组比Ⅱ、Ⅲ组分别提高50%、60%,疗效显著。

Abstract: To compare healing effect on porcine respiratory diseases,pigs were treated with rifampicin,amikacin and a combination of penicillin and streptomycin,respectively.The period of treatment was 4 d.The pigs of group I treated with rifampicin had a cure rate of 87.1% and effective rate of 100%.The pigs of group II treated with amikacin had a cure rate of 34.4% and effective rate of 87.5%.The pigs of group III treated with the combination of penicillin and streptomycin had a cure rate of 28.1% and effective rate of 84.4%.As checked by χ^2 test,the healing effect was significantly different between the group I and the group II or between the group I and the group III (P〈0.01) but not significantly different between the group II and the group III (P 〉0.05).The healing effect of the group I was 50% higher than that of the group II and 60% higher than that of the group III.

中图分类号: