畜牧与饲料科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 40-44.doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2025.04.006

• 草业科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

燕麦、光叶紫花苕不同比例混播对生物产量和青贮品质的影响

张忠贵1, 陈光吉2, 张蓉2, 何玲1, 胡荣斌1, 尚以顺2, 陈强2   

  1. 1.思南县农业农村局,贵州 思南 565108;
    2.贵州省农业科学院草业研究所,贵州 贵阳 550006
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-09 出版日期:2025-07-30 发布日期:2025-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 陈光吉(1990—),男,副研究员,硕士,主要研究方向为反刍动物营养。
  • 作者简介:张忠贵(1971—),男,高级畜牧师,主要研究方向为草地畜牧。
  • 基金资助:
    铜仁市科技计划项目“牧草-肉牛+”高效循环利用技术研究与应用(铜仁市科研〔202023〕74号); 贵州省牧草产业技术体系建设项目(GZMCCYJSTX-03)

Effects of Different Mixing Sowing Ratios of Avena sativa and Vicia benghalensis on Biomass Yield and Silage Quality

ZHANG Zhonggui1, CHEN Guangji2, ZHANG Rong2, HE Ling1, HU Rongbin1, SHANG Yishun2, CHEN Qiang2   

  1. 1. Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau of Sinan County,Sinan 565108,China;
    2. Guizhou Institute of Prataculture, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Guiyang 550006,China
  • Received:2025-05-09 Online:2025-07-30 Published:2025-10-28

摘要: [目的]研究燕麦(Avena sativa)、光叶紫花苕(Vicia benghalensis)不同混播比例对其生物产量和青贮品质的影响。[方法]在贵州省铜仁市思南县三道水乡(27°70′ N,108°09′ E),采用单因素完全随机试验设计,设置燕麦:光叶紫花苕混播比例(质量比)为3:1(T1)、4:1(T2)、5:1(T3)和6:1(T4)、单播燕麦(C1)、单播光叶紫花苕(C2)6个处理,每个处理3次重复,在刈割第2茬(燕麦乳熟期、光叶紫花苕初花期)测定生物产量后取样装入真空袋放于室内干燥处室温贮存,30 d后测定青贮品质指标。[结果]全期鲜草和干草产量均以C1处理最高,但与T4处理无显著(P>0.05)差异,二者的干草产量显著(P<0.05)高于其他处理,鲜草产量显著(P<0.05)高于除T3以外的其他处理。营养成分方面,T1、T2、T3、T4、C1处理组的DM含量无显著差异(P>0.05),但显著(P<0.05)低于C2处理组;各处理组之间的粗脂肪(EE)含量无显著差异(P>0.05);T1、T2、T3、T4、C1处理组的酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)无显著差异(P>0.05);T4处理组的可溶性碳水化合物(WSC)与C1处理组无显著差异(P>0.05),二者显著(P<0.05)高于其他处理组。发酵参数方面,T1、T2、T3、T4处理组的pH值、氨态氮/总氮值随着混播比例的提高而降低,而乳酸和乙酸含量随混播比例的提高而增加,未检出丁酸。[结论]在该试验条件下,燕麦与光叶紫花苕混播提高了饲草营养品质和混合青贮的发酵品质,适宜混播比例为6:1。

关键词: 燕麦, 光叶紫花苕, 混播比例, 青贮品质

Abstract: [Objective] To evaluate the effects of different mixing sowing ratios of Avena sativa and Vicia benghalensis on biomass yield and silage quality. [Methods] The experiment was conducted in Sandaoshui Township, Sinan County, Tongren City, Guizhou Province (27°70′N, 108°09′E) using a single-factor completely randomized design. Six treatments were established with A. sativa:V. benghalensis mixing sowing ratios (by mass) of 3:1 (T1), 4:1 (T2), 5:1 (T3), and 6:1 (T4), sole A. sativa (C1) and sole V. benghalensis (C2), each with three replicates. After determining biomass yield at the second cutting stage (A. sativa at milk stage, V. benghalensis at initial flowering stage), samples were collected, sealed in vacuum bags, and stored at room temperature in a dry indoor environment, and silage quality parameters were assessed after 30 days. [Results] The total fresh and dry forage yields were highest in the C1 treatment, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05) compared with the T4 treatment; the dry forage yields of C1 and T4 treatments were significantly higher (P<0.05) than those of other treatments, and their fresh forage yields were significantly higher (P<0.05) than all treatments except T3. Regarding nutritional composition, dry matter (DM) content showed no significant differences (P>0.05) among T1, T2, T3, T4, and C1 treatments, but was significantly lower (P<0.05) than that of C2 treatment; crude fat (EE) content did not differ significantly (P>0.05) among treatments; acid detergent fiber (ADF) content showed no significant differences (P>0.05) among T1, T2, T3, T4, and C1 treatments; water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content in T4 treatment was not significantly different (P>0.05) from C1 treatment, but both were significantly higher (P<0.05) than other treatments. For fermentation parameters, pH and ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen ratios in T1, T2, T3, and T4 treatments decreased with increasing mixing sowing ratios, while lactic acid and acetic acid contents increased with increasing mixing sowing ratios. Butyric acid was not detected. [Conclusion] Under the experimental conditions, mixing sowing of A. sativa and V. benghalensis enhanced forage nutritional quality and silage fermentation quality, with an optimal mixing sowing ratio of 6:1.

Key words: Avena sativa, Vicia benghalensis, mixing sowing ratio, silage quality

中图分类号: