Animal Husbandry and Feed Science ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 77-82.doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2022.03.013

• Animal Husbandry Economics and Information • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Economic Benefit Analysis of Alfalfa Planting in Hohhot City,Inner Mongolia——Taking Alfalfa Planting Park in Tumed Left Banner as an Example

LIU Yu-ting1, JIN Hui-qing2, Erdunzhama2, LIU Li-ping3, MI Fu-gui1   

  1. 1. College of Grassland,Resources and Environment,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010011,China;
    2. Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau of Hohhot City of Inner Mongolia,Hohhot 010011,China;
    3. Inner Mongolia Zhengshi Ecological Agriculture Group Co.,Ltd.,Hohhot 010011,China
  • Received:2022-03-01 Published:2022-05-24

Abstract: [Objective] To assess the economic benefit of alfalfa planting in a alfalfa planting park, locating in the national modern agricultural demonstration area of Tumed Left Banner, Hohhot City, Inner Mongolia, where the ′high-quality forage technology research project′ is implemented, so as to provide guidance for adjusting the planting structure and promoting the development of the alfalfa industry in this area. [Method] Data of six categories of input factors during alfalfa planting process in the surveyed alfalfa planting park, such as seed, pesticide and mechanical fuel oil, were collected. The primary and secondary output factors were regressed and evaluated using the Cobb-Douglas production function model. [Result] Among the six categories of input factors, the mechanical fuel oil and pesticide inputs had negative influences on profit of alfalfa planting in the primary output model, whereas the remaining inputs had positive impacts, with the seed input having a significant (P<0.05) impact. Seed, chemical fertilizer as well as water and electricity inputs all exhibited a positive connection with alfalfa yield in the secondary output model. The profit output model was: Youtput=4.532 503-0.265 386Xseed+0.638 345Xchemical fertilizer-2.988 071Xwater and electricity+5.506 927Xmechanical fuel oil-2.662 652Xlabor-2.895 284Xpesticide. The yield output model was: Youtput=18.740 580+1.415 616Xseed+0.252 048Xchemical fertilizer+0.371 124Xwater and electricity+0.497 999Xmechanical fuel oil+0.060 733Xlabor+0.184 595Xpesticide. The marginal yield of seed, chemical fertilizer, water and electricity, mechanical fuel oil, pesticide and labor inputs were 7.981, 0.472, 0.549, 5.301, 0.475 and 3.176 kg/hm2, respectively. Mechanical fuel oil accounted for the highest percentage (44.59%) among the input factors in alfalfa planting. Planting of alfalfa experienced a gradually growing stage of scale reward. The marginal yield of alfalfa seed and mechanical fuel oil inputs was significantly larger than zero. Alfalfa production could be improved by increasing these two inputs. [Conclusion] In this area′s alfalfa production practices, the seed, pesticide and mechanical fuel oil inputs should be boosted, while the other input factors should be kept under control.

Key words: alfalfa industry, Cobb-Douglas production function, economic benefit analysis, Hohhot City

CLC Number: