烤烟初烤阶段喷施不同物料比复合生物制剂对陕南烟叶品质的影响

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2024.03.07

北方农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 64-75.doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2024.03.07

烤烟初烤阶段喷施不同物料比复合生物制剂对陕南烟叶品质的影响

郑杰¹, 胡鑫¹, 张傲杰¹, 王平平², 郭春生³, 叶亚军³, 龚廷锋¹, 艾绥龙², 张立新¹

1.西北农林科技大学生命科学学院,陕西杨凌 712100;
2.陕西省烟草科学研究所,陕西西安 710000;
3.内蒙古昆明卷烟有限责任公司,内蒙古呼和浩特 010020

收稿日期:2024-03-22 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-09-13
通讯作者: 张立新（1969—）,男,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事烟草栽培与调制生理的研究工作。
作者简介:郑杰（1998—）,男,硕士研究生,研究方向为生物工程。
基金资助:
中国烟草总公司陕西省公司重大科技项目（SXYC-2021-KJ-01）

Effects of spraying compound biological agents with different material ratios on the quality of tobacco leaves in southern Shaanxi during the initial baking stage of flue-cured tobacco

ZHENG Jie¹, HU Xin¹, ZHANG Aojie¹, WANG Pingping², GUO Chunsheng³, YE Yajun³, GONG Tingfeng¹, AI Suilong², ZHANG Lixin¹

1. College of Life Sciences,Northwest A & F University,Yangling 712100,China;
2. Shaanxi Institute of Tobacco Science,Xi'an 710000,China;
3. Inner Mongolia Kunming Cigarette Limited Liability Company,Hohhot 010020,China

Received:2024-03-22 Online:2024-06-20 Published:2024-09-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】分析烤烟初烤过程中喷施复合生物制剂对陕南烟叶品质的影响,为复合生物制剂物料比的选择及烤后烟叶质量的调控提供参考。【方法】以陕西省商洛市主栽烤烟品种云烟99上部叶（B2F）为试验材料,设计5%物料比（T1）、4%物料比（T2）、3%物料比（T3）3种复合生物制剂（SXC-4）处理,在初烤阶段变黄期末期（42 ℃）进行喷施,测定烤后烟叶的化学成分和致香物质含量,并进行感官评价分析。【结果】与CK相比,T1处理下果胶和木质素的降解效果最好,分别降低了58.00%和5.90%;T2处理下游离氨基酸含量和致香物质含量的增加效果最好,分别增加了6.50%和51.80%;T3处理下还原性糖、总糖、莨菪亭、质体色素降解产物、苯丙氨酸类致香物质、Amadori化合物含量提升最高,分别为21.00%、17.00%、51.00%、54.80%、2.70%、11.20%,且感官质量得分最高,为60.95;且T3处理果胶和木质素分别降低43.49%、4.50%,游离氨基酸含量提高2.90%,处理效果与T1、T2处理相比较差。【结论】烤烟初烤阶段喷施复合生物制剂可改善烟叶化学成分的协调性、烟叶的香气质和香气量、提升透发性、降低杂气和刺激性、改善浓度和劲头,感官质量明显提升,其中喷施3%物料比的复合生物制剂可明显提升陕南烟叶品质。

关键词: 烤烟, 复合生物制剂, 烟叶品质, 初烤阶段

Abstract: 【Objective】To analyze the effect of spraying compound biological agents on the quality of tobacco leaves in southern Shaanxi during the initial baking process of flue-cured tobacco,so as to provide a reference for the selection of the material ratio of compound biological agents and the regulation of the quality of tobacco leaves after curing.【Methods】The upper leaves （B2F） of Yunyan 99 was the main flue-cured tobacco cultivar in Shangluo City,Shaanxi Province,were used as the experimental materials,and three kinds of compound biological agents （SXC-4） were designed,including 5% material ratio （T1）,4% material ratio （T2） and 3% material ratio （T3）,and sprayed at the yellowing stage and final stage （42 °C） at the initial baking stage,and the chemical composition and aromatic substance content of the flue-cured tobacco leaves were determined, and the sensory evaluation and analysis were carried out.【Results】Compared with CK,the degradation effect of pectin and lignin was the best under T1 treatment,which decreased by 58.00% and 5.90%,respectively;the content of free amino acids and aromatic substances in the downstream of T2 treatment had the best effect,increasing by 6.50% and 51.80%,respectively;under T3 treatment,the contents of reducing sugar,total sugar,chrysatropic acid,degradation products of plastid pigments,phenylalanine aromatic substances and Amadori compounds content increased the most,which were 21.00%,17.00%,51.00%,54.80%,2.70% and 11.20%,respectively,and the score of sensory quality was the highest,was 60.95;pectin and lignin of T3 treatment decreased by 43.49% and 4.50%,respectively,and the content of free amino acids increased by 2.90%,the treatment effect was worse than T1 and T2 treatments.【Conclusion】The spraying of compound biological agents in the initial baking stage of flue-cured tobacco can improve the coordination of chemical components,the aroma quality and quantity of tobacco leaves,improve the transmission,reduce miscellaneous qi and thrill,improve the concentration and strength,and significantly improve the sensory quality,among which the spraying of compound biological agents with 3% material ratio can significantly improve the quality of tobacco leaves in southern Shaanxi.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Compound biological agents, Quality of tobacco leaves, Initial baking stage of flue-cured tobacco

中图分类号:

TS441

郑杰, 胡鑫, 张傲杰, 王平平, 郭春生, 叶亚军, 龚廷锋, 艾绥龙, 张立新. 烤烟初烤阶段喷施不同物料比复合生物制剂对陕南烟叶品质的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2024, 52(3): 64-75.

ZHENG Jie, HU Xin, ZHANG Aojie, WANG Pingping, GUO Chunsheng, YE Yajun, GONG Tingfeng, AI Suilong, ZHANG Lixin. Effects of spraying compound biological agents with different material ratios on the quality of tobacco leaves in southern Shaanxi during the initial baking stage of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2024, 52(3): 64-75.

参考文献

[1] 张立新,韦成才.秦巴特色优质烟叶开发理论与实践[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2016.
[2] 陈凤娥,王平平,黄金辉,等.陕西秦巴烟区6年间烤烟主要化学成分含量的分布特征研究[J].陕西农业科学,2021,67(10):29-34.
[3] 雷亚芳. 不同酶制剂与香料处理对烟叶品质及微生物多样性的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.
[4] 王金棒,邱纪青,汪志波,等.生物技术在烟草发酵领域的专利布局现状及热点分析[J].烟草科技,2021,54(10):96-112.
[5] 黄申,芦尧,刘强,等.生物酶在烟草工业中的应用研究进展[J].轻工学报,2023,38(5):112-118.
[6] 黄申,刘丹阳,张增辉,等.肠杆菌和不动杆菌混菌发酵提升山东烟叶品质机制研究[J].轻工学报,2023,38(1):45-53.
[7] 周显升,李晓阳,刘志广,等.山东烤烟感官质量与化学成分关系及质量预测模型建立[J].中国农学通报2024,40(1):128-134.
[8] 李少鹏. 利用生物技术降解烟叶淀粉和蛋白质含量研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2006.
[9] 闫克玉,赵磊,朱国成,等.混合酶制剂改善上部烟叶品质研究[J].郑州轻工业学院学报,2004(1):52-55.
[10] 王林,朱金峰,许自成,等.不同酶制剂对烤烟上部叶化学成分、游离态和糖苷结合态中性香气成分的影响[J].生物技术进展,2015,5(6):455-460.
[11] 马海燕. 果胶酶和纤维素酶对烤烟中化学成分的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2009.
[12] 任晓红. 烤烟细胞壁物质与烟叶质量的关系[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2008.
[13] 孙伟峰,周志磊,殷春燕,等.酶解细胞壁对低等级烟叶品质的改良作用[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(7):70-76.
[14] 陈竹亭. 陈化进程中烟叶表面细菌组成的变化以及果胶质降解菌群的分离[D].南京:南京大学,2012.
[15] 宫长荣,王爱华,王松峰.烟叶烘烤过程中多酚类物质的变化及与化学成分的相关分析[J].中国农业科学,2005(11):173-177.
[16] 李丛民. 植物多酚对烟草制品品质的影响[J].烟草科技,2000(1):27-28.
[17] 李尼杭,卢红,杨焕文.烘烤过程多酚氧化酶抑制剂对烤烟多酚的影响[J].云南农业大学学报,2007(1):69-73.
[18] 张婕,赵会纳,朱文静,等.烘烤前后烟叶葡萄糖和氨基酸及Amadori化合物含量的差异分析[J].烟草科技,2021,54(11):25-27.

烤烟初烤阶段喷施不同物料比复合生物制剂对陕南烟叶品质的影响

Effects of spraying compound biological agents with different material ratios on the quality of tobacco leaves in southern Shaanxi during the initial baking stage of flue-cured tobacco

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	董建飞祝强雷建军李晓娟黄志伟. 赤峰市松山区烟叶入户预检收购现状及对策[J]. 北方农业学报, 2014, (6): 128-128.
[2]	孙宝增李树华温永波李彦明祁桂江吴亚臣. 密集烤房装烟步梯车应用初探[J]. 北方农业学报, 2014, (4): 36-36.
[3]	耿成茂. 不同覆盖栽培模式对烤烟生长发育及产量、质量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2014, (2): 28-28.
[4]	尚志强. 可降解地膜对烤烟生长发育及产量质量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2012, (6): 29-29.
[5]	吴亚臣李树华温永波刘赛龙. 烤烟种植成本分析[J]. 北方农业学报, 2012, (3): 43-43.
[6]	冀浩刘永强周立非徐树德张晓海尚志强张兴慧. 不同烤烟品种在云南景东的适应性研究[J]. 北方农业学报, 2011, (6): 31-31.
[7]	尚志强徐刚许志强李春亮李仕山. “闳康生物调节剂”对烤烟生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2011, (6): 62-62.
[8]	尚志强徐刚许志强李春亮李仕山. 秸秆还田对烤烟根际微生物种群数量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2011, (5): 63-63.
[9]	赵登花赵登宏. 彭阳县烤烟生产及效益情况的调查[J]. 北方农业学报, 2011, (4): 120-120.
[10]	罗丽琼. 不同类型肥料对烤烟生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2011, (2): 51-51.
[11]	康健丽. 气候条件对烤烟生长发育的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2010, (6): 58-58.
[12]	贾虎虎武珂峰. 内蒙古烤烟种植形势分析[J]. 北方农业学报, 2010, (6): 15-15.
[13]	王艳萍赵秋蓉李力群武珂峰贾虎虎. 烤烟工商交接现状与提高烟叶等级合格率措施的探讨[J]. 北方农业学报, 2010, (6): 18-18.
[14]	徐树德赵忠华尚志强. 种植密度对烤烟生长和产量质量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2010, (4): 46-46.
[15]	张晓海尚志强童荣崑. 烤烟地膜覆盖研究进展[J]. 北方农业学报, 2010, (4): 87-87.