宿迁市引种芍药资源的综合评价

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2022.06.13

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】To establish a comprehensive evaluation system of herbaceous peony cultivars，screen cultivars suitable for outdoor cultivation in Suqian City，Jiangsu Province，and provide reference for large-scale introduction and landscape application of herbaceous peony.【Methods】Using 104 herbaceous peony cultivars as the experimental materials，the quantitative evaluation of 11 key traits was carried out from three aspects，adaptability，plant characteristics and ornamental quality by analytic hierarchy process（AHP）.【Results】The weight of adaptability was the largest at 0.539 0，which was more important than plant characteristics and ornamental. 104 cultivars were divided into four grades. 12 cultivars，including Zijinlian，Saifugui and Zifengyu，were at Grade Ⅰ，superior，and were recommended for preferentially application in Suqian City. 45 cultivars，including Dahongpao，Huangyuqiu，and Shaonnyuzhuang，were at Grade Ⅱ，fine，could be used conservatively. 29 cultivars were at Grade Ⅲ and could be used appropriately，including Fencijinyu，Yanzhihong，and Caozhouhong. 18 cultivars，including Tieganzi，Kunshanxiaguang and Luxihong were evaluated as Grade Ⅳ and deemed unsuitable for development and utilization in Suqian City.【Conclusion】12 herbaceous peony cultivars including Zijinlian，Saifugui，Zifengyu，Hongyanyuchun，Xingguangcanlan，Furongronghua，Jiguanzi，Lanchongmeng，Shuiyingchunlan，Yinxianxiuhongpao，Liantaizi and Meiju were selected out of 104 cultivars as being suitable for outdoor cultivation in Suqian City，Jiangsu Province.

Key words: Herbaceous peony, Introduction and cultivation, Analytic hierarchy process（AHP）, Comprehensive evaluation

CLC Number:

S682.12

MA Li, CHEN Fen, REN Jing, LIU Bo. Comprehensive evaluation on herbaceous peony resources introduced in Suqian City[J].Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2022, 50(6): 98-104.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2022.06.13

https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/Y2022/V50/I6/98

Figures/Tables 4

References 22

[1]	李清道, 李君, 张巧红. 芍药花期控制技术[J]. 中国花卉园艺, 2008(18):22.
[2]	于晓楠. 观赏芍药[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2019.
[3]	陈文静, 郑钰宁, 赵琳, 等. DESI-MSI和UPLC分析芍药根不同组织药效成分的分布[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2022, 47(16):4333-4340.
[4]	叶康. 上海地区栽培芍药园林应用价值的综合评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(22):155-158.
[5]	孟秦语. 杨凌芍药栽培适应性评价与切花品种筛选[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
[6]	ZHANG J, WANG X, ZHANG D, et al. Evaluating the comprehensive performance of herbaceous peonies at low latitudes by the integration of long-running quantitative observation and multi-criteria decision making approach[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9:15079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51425-0 pmid: 31636314
[7]	韩见宇, 王永, 董燕, 等. 贵州省植物园芍药引种栽培观察[J]. 贵州科学, 2020, 38(5):32-34.
[8]	司仕英, 孟秦语, 孙道阳, 等. 关中地区引种芍药品种的综合性状评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(6):134-139.
[9]	陈曦, 刘志洋. 哈尔滨地区不同品种芍药引种及越冬情况调查[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2015(5):75-77.
[10]	史小华, 张佳平, 刘毅, 等. 国外引进盆栽芍药品种在杭州的生长观测及筛选[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(1):334-342.
[11]	万映伶, 刘爱青, 张孔英, 等. 菏泽和洛阳芍药品种资源表型多样性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(3):110-121.
[12]	中华人民共和国农业部. 植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性测试指南芍药:NY/T 2225—2012[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
[13]	SAATY A L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York: McGraw Hill,Inc, 1980.
[14]	张佳平, 李丹青, 李康, 等. “芍药南移”的重新思考[J]. 中国园林, 2016, 32(4):91-95.
[15]	高鹏, 宋朝伟. 我国各气候区芍药引种情况地域性差异探究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2022, 28(4):52-53.
[16]	王莉飞, 徐佳洁, 黄晓霞, 等. 57份现代月季种质资源表型性状及综合评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 42(1):83-90.
[17]	吴丹, 聂洧洁, 胡园园, 等. 29个大丽花品种灰色关联度分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(2):34-37.
[18]	王晓晖, 刘红凡, 冀含乐, 等. 基于层次分析法(AHP)的牡丹切花优良品种筛选试验[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2020, 66(11):36-40.
[19]	张冬菊, 张晓, 吴鹏夫, 等. 基于层次分析法的切花菊引种适应性评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(22):82-85.
[20]	付存念, 潘可可, 杨程鹏, 等. 基于层次分析法的温州月季资源适应性评价[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2021, 48(5):763-770.
[21]	覃泳智, 周海将, 刘思. 基于层次分析法的柳州杜鹃花引种价值综合评价[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(21):17-20.
[22]	方娟. 长沙地区引种萱草品种的综合评价及抗旱性研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2022.

Comprehensive evaluation on herbaceous peony resources introduced in Suqian City

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 22

Related Articles 10

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Liping, GAO Minli, ZHANG Yongmin, JIN Yingling, HAN Rong. Taste type tomato quality indexes analysis and comprehensive evaluation [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(5): 67-74.
[2]	JIANG Lixia, REN Junrong, ZHANG Zhi, MIAO Pinggui, WANG Jinghong, YANG Jianli. Application comparison of DTOPSIS method and gray correlation analysis method in comprehensive evaluation of new spring rapeseed varieties [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 88-95.
[3]	SUN Ying, WANG Fengwu, DAI Guixiang, ZHENG Chengzhong, MEI Xue, ZHANG Zizhen, WANG Qianjun, XU Zhenpeng, HUANG Wenjuan, YE Lu. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of soybean varieties suitable for planting in the north foot of Yinshan Mountains [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(3): 29-38.
[4]	ZHENG Chengzhong, XU Zhenpeng, ZHANG Zizhen, WANG Qianjun, MEI Xue, SUN Ying, WANG Fengwu, YE Lu. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic,quality traits and adaptability of new naked oat varieties （lines） [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 12-21.
[5]	GAO Xing, JIA Huiguo. Analysis and evaluation of soil fertility characteristics for ancient trees in the Palace of Great Blessings in the Forbidden City [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(1): 45-60.
[6]	QIU Pengcheng, MIAO Yongmao, DU Yongchun, CHANG Guoyou, WU Yunxia. Evaluation of drought tolerance and salt tolerance of 16 maize varieties at germination stag [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2021, 49(2): 11-16.
[7]	DING Ning, ZHANG Yuqiang, ZHANG Shenju. Comparative analysis of comprehensive evaluation of silage corn new varieties by grey correlation analysis and DTOPSIS method [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2021, 49(1): 10-16.
[8]	MU Shilei, GONG Fang. Evaluation and contrastive analysis of the development level of leisure agriculture in western China [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2019, 47(5): 105-111.
[9]	. Application of multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in soil health assessment [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2017, 45(6): 92-92.
[10]	. Application of Similarity-Difference Analysis Method in Germplasm Resources Evaluation of Sunflower [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2014, (6): 11-11.