DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在春油菜新品种综合评价中的应用比较

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.04.11

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Compare the application of DTOPSIS method and grey correlation analysis method in comprehensive evaluation of new spring rapeseed varieties，to provide references for the breeding of new spring rapeseed varieties.【Methods】Using the entropy weight DTOPSIS method and grey correlation analysis method，comprehensive evaluation was conducted on 11 traits of 9 varieties in the 2021 Shaanxi Province spring rapeseed regional trial. The advantages and disadvantages of the two methods in evaluation ability were compared and analyzed.【Results】The use of entropy weight avoided the subjectivity of evaluation results. DTOPSIS method and gray correlation analysis method comprehensively evaluated multiple traits of rapeseed，avoided the unicity of evaluation criteria.When each trait index was given the same entropy weight，the sorting results of DTOPSIS method and gray correlation analysis method were basically the same，but the biggest difference of C_i value in DTOPSIS method was 81.23%，and the biggest difference of G_i value in gray correlation analysis method was only 41.71%. Compared with the ranking trend line based on yield only，the trend lines of gray correlation analysis method G_i value ranking and DTOPSIS method C_i value ranking were more consistent. The results of correlation analysis showed that DTOPSIS method C_i value ranking was significantly positively correlated with the gray correlation analysis method G_i value ranking，but not significantly correlated with the ranking based on yield.【Conclusion】Both DTOPSIS method and gray correlation analysis method could comprehensively and objectively evaluate new spring rapeseed varieties. However，using DTOPSIS method to evaluate the differences between varieties was more comprehensive and the evaluation effect was better than the gray correlation analysis method.

Key words: Spring rapeseed, DTOPSIS method, Gray correlation analysis method, Comprehensive evaluation, Entropy weight

CLC Number:

S634.3

JIANG Lixia, REN Junrong, ZHANG Zhi, MIAO Pinggui, WANG Jinghong, YANG Jianli. Application comparison of DTOPSIS method and gray correlation analysis method in comprehensive evaluation of new spring rapeseed varieties[J].Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 88-95.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.04.11

https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/Y2023/V51/I4/88

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Figure 1

References 24

[1]	张哲, 殷艳, 刘芳, 等. 我国油菜多功能开发利用现状及发展对策[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(5):618-623. doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2018.05.002
[2]	杜德志, 肖麓, 赵志, 等. 我国春油菜遗传育种研究进展[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2018, 40(5):633-639. doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2018.05.004
[3]	董育红, 关周博, 张忠鑫, 等. 富α-亚麻酸春油菜品种鸿油88的选育及示范推广[J]. 作物研究, 2020, 34(5):492-494.
[4]	邹永红, 谭建林. 基于灰色关联度的DTOPSIS方法在水稻优选中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(19):11421-11424.
[5]	王瑞, 李加纳, 张学昆, 等. DTOPSIS方法在油菜新品种综合评估中的应用[J]. 西南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 25(4):324-326.
[6]	金轻, 赵红, 林丽萍, 等. 基于灰色关联度分析和DTOPSIS法综合评价小麦新品系在云南省的适应性[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(10):2440-2446.
[7]	夏来坤, 齐建双, 谷利敏, 等. 基于熵权的DTOPSIS法和灰色局势决策法在宜机收玉米品种综合评价中的应用[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(9):1953-1959.
[8]	张慧敏, 耿若飞, 王二伟, 等. 灰色关联度分析和DTOPSIS法在综合评价大豆新品种(系)中的应用[J]. 大豆科技, 2022(2):14-21.
[9]	敖学成, 傅平, 柳茜, 等. 利用DTOPSIS法与灰关联度法综合评价苜蓿引种试验的分析研究[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2010(5):7-10.
[10]	马辉, 戴路, 刘燕. 灰色关联度法和DTOPSIS法在机采棉品种综合评价中的应用[J]. 中国棉花, 2015, 42(6):27-29.
[11]	李彦平, 李淑君, 吴娟霞, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在新引烤烟新品种综合评价中的应用比较[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2012, 18(4):35-40.
[12]	白永富, 卢秀萍. 烤烟区试品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2006, 21(6):761-764.
[13]	胡建涛, 王友华, 程辉, 等. DTOPSIS法在油菜新品种综合评定中的应用[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2007, 53(1):12-13.
[14]	李德文, 张太平, 王军, 等. 应用DTOPSIS法综合评价油菜新品种的初探[J]. 种子, 2006, 25(9):65-67.
[15]	宋秀丽, 吴玥, 杨锡朗, 等. 基于熵值赋权的DTOPSIS法与灰色关联度分析在玉米品种综合评价中的比较[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(2):41-46.
[16]	ZOU Z H, YUN Y, SUN J N. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2006, 18(5):1020-1023. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60032-6
[17]	李灿, 张凤荣, 朱泰峰, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用绩效评价及关联分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(5):217-227.
[18]	WANG Z H, PENG H, YUE C N, et al. Selection of core evaluation indices and construction of a comprehensive evaluation method for machine-harvested tea plant cultivars[J]. Euphytica, 2022, 218(11):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10681-021-02955-0
[19]	任亮, 张海涛, 魏明珠, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的智慧城市发展水平评价研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(7):113-118.
[20]	姚兴涛. 区域城乡社会经济协调发展系统研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 1990.
[21]	郭瑞林. 作物灰色育种学[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1995:54-60.
[22]	昝凯, 周青, 张志民, 等. 灰色关联度和DTOPSIS法综合分析河南区域试验中大豆新品种(系)的农艺性状表现[J]. 大豆科学, 2018, 37(5):664-671.
[23]	张晓申, 韩燕丽, 樊永强, 等. 基于灰色关联度和DTOPSIS法对谷子区域试验的综合评价[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(9):121-126.
[24]	杨禹伟, 陈华, 姜波, 等. 一种加工番茄品质的多性状评价方法[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(3):131-137.

Application comparison of DTOPSIS method and gray correlation analysis method in comprehensive evaluation of new spring rapeseed varieties

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 24

Related Articles 12

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Liping, GAO Minli, ZHANG Yongmin, JIN Yingling, HAN Rong. Taste type tomato quality indexes analysis and comprehensive evaluation [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(5): 67-74.
[2]	SUN Ying, WANG Fengwu, DAI Guixiang, ZHENG Chengzhong, MEI Xue, ZHANG Zizhen, WANG Qianjun, XU Zhenpeng, HUANG Wenjuan, YE Lu. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of soybean varieties suitable for planting in the north foot of Yinshan Mountains [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(3): 29-38.
[3]	ZHENG Chengzhong, XU Zhenpeng, ZHANG Zizhen, WANG Qianjun, MEI Xue, SUN Ying, WANG Fengwu, YE Lu. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic,quality traits and adaptability of new naked oat varieties （lines） [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 12-21.
[4]	GAO Xing, JIA Huiguo. Analysis and evaluation of soil fertility characteristics for ancient trees in the Palace of Great Blessings in the Forbidden City [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(1): 45-60.
[5]	MA Li, CHEN Fen, REN Jing, LIU Bo. Comprehensive evaluation on herbaceous peony resources introduced in Suqian City [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2022, 50(6): 98-104.
[6]	QIU Pengcheng, MIAO Yongmao, DU Yongchun, CHANG Guoyou, WU Yunxia. Evaluation of drought tolerance and salt tolerance of 16 maize varieties at germination stag [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2021, 49(2): 11-16.
[7]	DING Ning, ZHANG Yuqiang, ZHANG Shenju. Comparative analysis of comprehensive evaluation of silage corn new varieties by grey correlation analysis and DTOPSIS method [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2021, 49(1): 10-16.
[8]	MU Shilei, GONG Fang. Evaluation and contrastive analysis of the development level of leisure agriculture in western China [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2019, 47(5): 105-111.
[9]	. Application of multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in soil health assessment [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2017, 45(6): 92-92.
[10]	. Application of Similarity-Difference Analysis Method in Germplasm Resources Evaluation of Sunflower [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2014, (6): 11-11.
[11]	. The Evaluation and Correlation of Agronomic Characters of Spring Rapeseed Varieties [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2014, (1): 22-22.
[12]	. Effect of Leaf-cutting on Spring Rape Source-sink Relationship [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2012, (3): 24-24.