不同药剂对马铃薯腐烂茎线虫的室内毒力测定及田间防效

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.04.08

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Clarify the indoor toxicity and field control efficacy of common nematicides on Ditylenchus destructor Thorne，to screen for pesticides with high contact-killing activity.【Methods】Direct contact killing method was used to determine the indoor toxicity of five chemical agents on the adult and larvae of Ditylenchus destructor Thorne. And field control efficacy of the five chemical agents and three microecological preparations was measured.【Results】After diluting for 100 times and applied for 72 hours，the toxicity of 10% thiazophos granules to the adults and larvae of Ditylenchus destructor Thorne was the highest，with LC₅₀ of 2.201 and 2.182 mg/L，respectively，followed by 41.7% fluoropyram suspension，with LC₅₀ of 2.999 and 2.952 mg/L，respectively.Among the 5 chemical agents，20% thiazophos aqueous emulsion had the best control efficacy of 89.49%，while 41.7% fluoropyram suspension had the highest yield increase rate of 14.57%. Among the three microecological preparations，Bacillus TB918 liquid bacterial preparation had the best control efficacy of 48.20%，and the highest yield increase rate of 5.51%.【Conclusion】The corrected mortality rate of the 5 chemical agents on Ditylenchus destructor Thorne increased with the increase of the chemical concentration and application time. 20% thiazophos aqueous emulsion had the best field control efficacy against Ditylenchus destructor Thorne among the chemical agents，while the Bacillus TB918 liquid bacterial preparation had the highest field control efficacy among the microecological preparations.

Key words: Ditylenchus destructor Thorne, Chemical agent, Microecological preparation, Laboratory toxicity test, Control efficacy

CLC Number:

S435.32

BAI Songlin, HUO Hongli, ZHANG Dongmei, LU Qi, YOU Junwen, JI Yongxiang, MIAO Chunle, ZHANG Pengfei, DAN Pengfei, XI Xianmei. Indoor toxicity and field control efficacy test of different pesticides against Ditylenchus destructor Thorne[J].Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 64-71.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.04.08

https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/Y2023/V51/I4/64

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 31

[1]	赵洪海, 梁晨, 张浴, 等. 腐烂茎线虫(Ditylenchus destructor Thorne,1945)生物学研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(7):45-55. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2021-0600
[2]	MWAURA P, NIERE B, VIDAL S. Application of an entomopathogenic fungus(Beauveria bassiana) increases potato nematodes reproduction and potato tubers damage caused by Ditylenchus destructor and D. dipsaci[J]. Biological Control, 2017, 115:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.08.012
[3]	HASHEMI K, KAREGAR A. Description of Ditylenchus paraparvus n. sp. from Iran with an updated list of Ditylenchus Filipjev,1936(Nematoda:Anguinidae)[J]. Zootaxa, 2019, 4651(1):6.
[4]	NI C H, HAN B, LIU Y G, et al. Diagnosis and characterization of the ribosomal DNA-ITS of potato rot nematode (Ditylenchus destructor) populations from Chinese medicinal herbs[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(6):1763-1781. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.126
[5]	江曙, 段金廒, 钱大玮, 等. 腐烂茎线虫侵染机理及其防治技术体系的研究思路与方法[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(11):127-130.
[6]	王宏宝, 刘伟中, 郭小山, 等. 腐烂茎线虫对马铃薯块茎危害症状及其线虫分布研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 10(35):1-4.
[7]	QIAO Y J, YU Q, BADISS A, et al. Paraphyletic genus Ditylenchus Filipjev(Nematoda,Tylenchida),corresponding to the D. triformis-group and the D. dipsaci-group scheme[J]. ZooKeys, 2016(568):1-12.
[8]	谢一芝, 尹晴红, 戴起伟, 等. 甘薯抗线虫病的遗传育种研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2004, 5(4):393-396.
[9]	刘先宝, 葛建军, 谭志琼, 等. 马铃薯腐烂茎线虫在国内危害马铃薯的首次报道[J]. 植物保护, 2006, 32(6):157-158.
[10]	杨艺炜, 王家哲, 常青, 等. 腐烂茎线虫综合防治研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(4):115-117.
[11]	商丽丽, 韩俊杰, 邱鹏飞, 等. 甘薯茎线虫病防控研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(18):137-138.
[12]	李鹏程, 尚虎山, 肖贵. 当归麻口病防治农药组合筛选[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(4):233-236.
[13]	漆永红, 杜蕙, 曹素芳, 等. 不同药剂对甘薯茎线虫病病原马铃薯腐烂茎线虫的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2011, 39(1):150-152.
[14]	GRAY N F. Ecology of nematophagous fungi:Comparison of the soil sprinkling method with the Baermann funnel technique in the isolation of endoparasites[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1984, 16(1):81-83. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(84)90131-7
[15]	张淑玲, 李惠霞, 徐鹏刚, 等. 黑龙江腐烂茎线虫群体的分离和鉴定[J]. 植物病理学报, 2019, 49(6):756-762.
[16]	姚思敏. 具杀植物线虫活性的芽孢杆菌筛选[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2018.
[17]	赵艳群, 刘忠雄, 赵文忠, 等. 不同药剂对马铃薯腐烂茎线虫病的田间防效[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(12):70-72.
[18]	陈品三. 杀线虫剂主要类型、特性及其作用机制[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2001, 22(2):33-35.
[19]	JEGER M, BRAGARD C, CAFFIER D, et al. Risk to plant health of Ditylenchus destructor for the EU territory[J]. EFSA Journal, 2016, 14(12):45-56.
[20]	赵立荣, 武目涛, 赵菊鹏, 等. 腐烂茎线虫对不同杀线剂的敏感性[J]. 植物检疫, 2018, 32(6):45-47.
[21]	夏彦飞, 李身, 杨晨光, 等. 吡虫啉对5种植物寄生线虫的室内毒力测定[J]. 现代农药, 2018, 17(5):36-38.
[22]	霍宏丽, 席先梅, 白全江, 等. 内蒙古自治区鄂尔多斯市马铃薯腐烂茎线虫种类鉴定研究[J]. 植物病理学报, 2022, 52(4):721-726.
[23]	黄健, 戚龙君, 王金成, 等. 腐烂茎线虫种内不同群体形态及遗传分析[J]. 植物病理学报, 2009, 39(2):125-131.
[24]	刘玮玮, 季静, 王超, 等. 枯草芽孢杆菌挥发产物的杀线虫活性评价及成分鉴定(英文)[J]. 植物病理学报, 2009, 39(3):304-309.
[25]	ZENG L M, JIN H, LU D X, et al. Isolation and identification of chemical constituents from the bacterium Bacillus sp. and their nematicidal activities[J]. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 2015, 55(10):1239-1244. doi: 10.1002/jobm.v55.10
[26]	夏彦飞. 拮抗植物寄生线虫的细菌菌株筛选及其杀线虫相关基因的鉴定[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2010.
[27]	黄加诚, 朱植银, 陈龚莉, 等. 阿维菌素与噻唑膦复配药剂防治生姜根结线虫病药效研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(9):137-138.
[28]	贤振华, 王昱莎, 艾辉建, 等. 不同药剂复配对南方根结线虫增效作用[J]. 农药, 2014, 53(6):449-452.
[29]	文廷刚, 杜小凤, 王伟中, 等. 几种复配药剂对黄瓜根结线虫的防治试验[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2009, 37(5):143-144.
[30]	徐芦, 高文川, 杨武娟, 等. 5种不同药剂对甘薯茎线虫防治效果的研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017, 25(14):69-70.
[31]	王家哲, 付博, 任平, 等. 5种药剂对马铃薯腐烂茎线虫的田间防治效果[J]. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(6):907-911.

Indoor toxicity and field control efficacy test of different pesticides against Ditylenchus destructor Thorne

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 31

Related Articles 6

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	GU Qingyi, LIU Lindong, SONG Haiyang, DUAN Hongbin, ZHANG Yaozhou, YE Run, SUN Wei, QIAO Xinrong. Indoor toxicity measurement and field control efficacy of four plant derived pesticides on Uroleucon gobonis [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(5): 62-66.
[2]	CHEN Wenjin, FAN Yafang, HE Xiaoyong, XI Xianmei, KONG Qingquan, HE Youquan, LI Hang, GUO Liming, ZHANG Lijun, HU Ruifeng. Analysis on the effect of two foliar-applied herbicides on broad leaf weeds in chickpea field [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(3): 66-71.
[3]	ZHAO Yuanzheng, ZHANG Bin, XU Limin, WANG Dong, PENG Jingwen, WANG Yu, ZHANG Peng, HAN Shengli, LIANG Dongchao. Control efficacy of microbial agents on potato black scurf and Verticillium wilt [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(3): 72-77.
[4]	YUN Xiaopeng;DU Lei;BAI Quanjiang;SUN Tao;TIAN Xiaoyan;SU Yajie;ZHANG Guang(Plant Protection Institute,Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural&Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,China;Gannan Sunflower Research Institute,Gannan 162100,China;Urad Front Banner Agricultural Technology Extension Center,Ula Mountain 014400,China). Control efficacy of plant elicitor IR-18 against Orobanche cumana and its application techniques [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2018, 46(6): 77-82.
[5]	. Control efficacy of four kinds of environmental agents for potato common scab [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2016, 44(5): 51-51.
[6]	. Study on Crop Safety and Weed Control Efficacy of an Acetochlor 25 % Microemulsion in Soybeans Yields [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2012, (4): 64-64.