畜牧与饲料科学 ›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 126-126.doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2010.01.063

• 畜牧生产 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同饲养方式对羔羊育肥效果的比较

陈国南[1] 陈晓静[1] 杨菲[2]   

  1. [1]贵州省饲草饲料工作站,贵州贵阳550001 [2]贵州省草业研究所,贵州独山558200
  • 出版日期:2010-01-20 发布日期:2010-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈国南
  • 作者简介:陈国南(1976-),男,畜牧师,硕士,主要从事草地畜牧业技术推广工作。 通讯作者:杨菲(1966-),女,农艺师,主要从事草业技术推广工作。

Comparison on The Feeding Effects of Lamb with Different Methods

CHEN Guo-nan, CHEN Xiao-jing, YANG Fei (1.Station of Forage and Fodder of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550001,China;2.Guizhou Pratacuhural Insitute,Dushan 558200, China)   

  • Online:2010-01-20 Published:2010-01-20

摘要: 在贵州省贵阳市花溪区麦坪乡国家牧草种子基地进行了3种饲养方式下,试验羊增重情况的比较试验。试验1组:放牧+补饲以玉米为主的精料;试验2组:放牧+补饲玉米青贮料为主的精料;试验3组:放牧。结果表明,试验1组总增重为(8.30±0.26)kg;试验2组总增重为(11.60±0.29)kg;对照组试验3组总增重为(4.35±0.28)kg,3组之间差异显著(P〈0.05)。

Abstract: The comparative experiment was carried out determining the feeding effect with three raising means located at State Forage Grass Seed-base in Maiping Town, Huaxi District, Guiyang City. In group 1, grazing was applied combined with concentrate supplementary feeding of corn; in group 2, grazing combined with concentrate supplementary feeding of whole corn silage; in group 3, grazing. The result indicated that group 1 in total weight gain was (8.30±0.26) kg, group 2 was (11.60±0.29) kg ahd group 3 was (4.35±0.28) kg. There was markedly different between group 3 and the control (P〈0.05).

中图分类号: