鄂尔多斯高原不同ET0计算方法的适用性比较——以鄂托克旗为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-1197.2019.01.19

北方农业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 114-119.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1197.2019.01.19

鄂尔多斯高原不同ET0计算方法的适用性比较——以鄂托克旗为例

高凌智[1,2];李彬[2];史海滨[1];赵举[1];尹春艳[1];戚迎龙[1,2]

[1]内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010018;[2]内蒙古农牧业科学院资源环境与检测技术研究所,内蒙古呼和浩特010031

收稿日期:2018-12-17 出版日期:2019-01-19 发布日期:2019-08-19
作者简介:高凌智(1995—),男,硕士,研究方向为节水灌溉理论与新技术;通讯作者:李彬(1982-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事节水灌溉与土壤环境科学的研究工作;通讯作者:史海滨(1961-),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事节水灌溉原理与应用的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0400305);内蒙古自然科学基金项目(2017BS0514).

Comparison of the applicability of ET0 determined with different calculation methods in the Ordos Plateau:Taking the Etuoke Banner as an example

GAO Lingzhi[1,2];LI Bin[2];SHI Haibin[1];ZHAO Ju[1];YIN Chunyan[1];QI Yinglong[1,2]

[1]College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010018,China;[2]Institute of Resources and Environment and Testing Technology,Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,China

Received:2018-12-17 Online:2019-01-19 Published:2019-08-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了找到适合鄂尔多斯高原区参考作物蒸散量(ET0)的计算方法,根据当地气象站监测的1961年1月至2010年12月的逐日气象数据,以FAO56Penman-Monteith法为标准,分别对FAO-79Penman法、Irmark-Allen法、Priestley-Taylor法和Hargreaves-Samani法进行对比分析,应用线性回归和方差分析对这4种方法的适应性进行评价。结果表明:在鄂尔多斯高原区FAO-79Penman法和Irmark-Allen法与FAO56Penman-Monteith法的计算结果更接近,因此在鄂尔多斯高原区可以用FAO-79Penman方法计算ET0值;在缺少湿度和风速资料的地区,可以用Irmark-Allen方法代替FAO56 Penman-Monteith法计算ET0值。

关键词: 参考作物腾发量(ET0);FAO56Penman-Monteith法;FAO-79Penman法;Irmark-Allen法;Priestley-Taylor法;Hargreaves-Samani法

Abstract: In order to find the suitable calculation methods for reference crop evapotranspiration(ET0)of the Ordos Plateau area and based on the daily meteorological data from January 1961 to December 2010 monitored by local weather stations,taking the FAO56Penman-Monteith method as the standard to compare with the FAO-79Penman method,Irmark-Allen method,Priestley-Taylor method,and Hargreaves-Samani method,the ET0 values were calculated respectively,and the adaptabilities of these four methods were evaluated by linear regression and variance analysis.The results showed that the calculation results by Irmark-Allen method and FAO-79Penman method were closer to those of the FAO56Penman-Monteith method in the Ordos Plateau area.Therefore,the ET0 value can be calculated using the FAO-79 Penman method in the Ordos Plateau area.If there are no humidity or wind speed data,the Irmark-Allen method can replace the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method to calculate the ET0 value.

Key words: Reference crop evapotranspiration(ET0);FAO56Penman-Monteith method;FAO-79Penman method;Irmark- Allen method;Priestley-Taylor method;Hargreaves-Samani method

中图分类号:

S161.4

高凌智;李彬;史海滨;赵举;尹春艳;戚迎龙. 鄂尔多斯高原不同ET0计算方法的适用性比较——以鄂托克旗为例[J]. 北方农业学报, 2019, 47(1): 114-119.

GAO Lingzhi;LI Bin;SHI Haibin;ZHAO Ju;YIN Chunyan;QI Yinglong(College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010018,China;Institute of Resources and Environment and Testing Technology,Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,China). Comparison of the applicability of ET0 determined with different calculation methods in the Ordos Plateau:Taking the Etuoke Banner as an example[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2019, 47(1): 114-119.

鄂尔多斯高原不同ET0计算方法的适用性比较——以鄂托克旗为例

Comparison of the applicability of ET0 determined with different calculation methods in the Ordos Plateau:Taking the Etuoke Banner as an example

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0