北方农业学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 107-107.

• 专题调查与述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国与哈萨克斯坦农产品贸易模式分析

陈俭[1] 陈果果[2] 布娲鹣·阿布拉[3]   

  1. [1]铜仁学院,贵州铜仁554300 [2]百色学院,广西百色533001 [3]新疆农业大学,新疆乌鲁木齐830052
  • 出版日期:2015-08-20 发布日期:2015-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈俭
  • 作者简介:陈俭(1985-),男,湖南隆回人,副教授,博士,主要从事农产品国际贸易研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金项目“FTA背景下中国与中亚五国农业经贸合作模式研究”(71063020)

Research on agricultural trade pattern between China and Kazakhstan

CHEN Jian,CHEN Guoguo,Buwajian Abula (1.Tongren College, Tongren 554300,China; 2.Baise University, Baise 533001,China; 3.Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumchi 830052,China)   

  • Online:2015-08-20 Published:2015-08-20

摘要: 该研究基于三个研究设定及比较优势、技术构成和产业内贸易这三个方面对中国与哈萨克斯坦农产品贸易模式进行全面分析,研究发现:中国对哈萨克斯坦农产品贸易模式违背了三个研究设定,不是一种健康、科学、可持续发展的贸易模式,中国对此需要高度重视并积极采取措施对现有模式进行调整与改进;而现阶段哈萨克斯坦对中国的农产品贸易模式则较好的符合了这三个研究设定;目前,双方仍以基于产品互补性的产业间贸易模式为主,但产业内贸易模式也开始有所发展。

Abstract: This paper based on three discuss-sitting (comparative advantage, technology, intra-industry trade) comprehensively analyzes the agricultural trade pattern between China and Kazakhstan. The study shows that: Chinese agricultural products trade patterns, violating the three discuss-sitting, are not healthy, scientific and sustainable development trade patterns. So China needs to pay high attention to it and take measures to adjust and improve the existing patterns actively. At the present stage, Kazakhstan to Chinese agricultural products trade patterns are better conformed to the theory of the three assumptions. At present, the bilateral trade between China and Kazakhstan is still mainly inter-industry trade pattern, basing on the complementary products, while the intra-industry trade patterns are beginning to grow.

中图分类号: 

  • F323.7