不同除草剂对黄芪田杂草防除效果及黄芪生物量、药材产量的影响研究

doi:10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2023.03.013

Abstract

Abstract:

[Objective] This study was conducted to assess the effects of different herbicides on the above-ground biomass accumulation and medicinal material yield of Astragalus membranaceus, and to evaluate their weed control efficacy in Astragalus membranaceus fields. [Method] Five types of post-emergence herbicides, including Herb Weed No.1 （YCC）, bentazone （MCS）, clethodim （XCT）, haloxyfop （GCN）, and sethoxydim （NBJ）, were applied on the annual Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus transplanted seedlings according to the recommended concentrations. Water was sprayed as the control （CK）. Each herbicide application treatment was repeated 3 times and a total of 18 experimental blocks were set. At the beginning of June 2021, the quadrat method was used to determine the number of plant, fresh mass, and dry mass of weeds in each experimental block. On July 10^th, August 10^th, and September 10^th in the same year, the above-ground biomass fresh weight and dry weight of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus in each experimental block were measured. In the harvest season （November in the same year）, the fresh weight and dry weight of medicinal material of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus in each experimental block were calculated. Variability analysis and single factor analysis of variance were utilized to assess the statistical data. [Result] The five herbicides had varying weed control efficacy, among which the YCC treatment group had the best, with stem control effect of 77.81%, fresh mass control effect of 64.48%, and dry mass control effect of 80.81%. There were no significant （P>0.05） differences in the above-ground biomass fresh weight, dry weight, and fresh-dry ratio of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus across the different herbicide treatment groups in July, August and September. In November, the fresh weight and dry weight of medicinal material of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus in the YCC treatment group were significantly （P<0.05） higher than those in the other treatment groups. [Conclusion] The application of Herb Weed No.1 displayed superior weed control efficacy in the transplanted fields of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus, with notable promoting effects on the above-ground biomass and medicinal material yield.

Key words: herbicide, Astragalus membranaceus, biomass, fresh-dry ratio, weed control efficacy, yield

CLC Number:

LI Xue, YIN Dabao, LIU Zhiyao, WAGN Jian, WANG Junjie. Weed Control Efficacy of Different Herbicides in Astragalus membranaceus Fields and The Influences on Astragalus membranaceus Biomass and Medicinal Material Yield[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(3): 89-95.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/xmysl/EN/10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2023.03.013

https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/xmysl/EN/Y2023/V44/I3/89

Figures/Tables 8

References 22

[1]	马艳春, 胡建辉, 吴文轩, 等. 黄芪化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 中医药学报, 2022, 50(4):92-95.
[2]	姜辉, 顾胜龙, 张玉婷, 等. 黄芪化学成分和药理作用研究进展[J]. 安徽中医药大学学报, 2020, 39(5):93-96.
[3]	国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典:2020年版一部[S]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020.
[4]	张淑娟, 张育贵, 牛江涛, 等. 黄芪的研究进展及其质量标志物预测分析[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2022, 40(2): 151-155.
[5]	LI L, XU W H, YI C J, et al. Astragalus polysaccharide has a protective effect on hematopoiesis in an irradiated mouse model and decreases apoptosis in megakaryocytes[J]. Molecular Medicine Reports, 2020, 23(1):1.
[6]	吕琴, 赵文晓, 王世军, 等. 黄芪活血功效及现代药理学研究进展[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2020, 26(9):215-224.
[7]	杨铭, 林海燕, 傅志泉. 黄芪注射液联合血塞通治疗气虚血瘀型急性脑梗死临床疗效观察[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2017, 35(5):1077-1079.
[8]	马可可, 鞠营辉, 陈清青, 等. 黄芪甲苷对2型糖尿病肾病大鼠肾组织PI3K/Akt/FoxO1信号调控的影响[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2019, 25(2):74-81.
[9]	XU X, RUI S, CHEN C, et al. Protective effects of Astragalus polysaccharide nanoparticles on septic cardiac dysfunction through inhibition of TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 153:977-985. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.227
[10]	秦雪梅, 李震宇, 孙海峰, 等. 中国黄芪药材生产现状与分析[C]// 生态文明建设中的植物学:现在与未来——中国植物学会第十五届会员代表大会暨八十周年学术年会论文集——第4分会场: 资源植物学. 南昌: 中国植物学会, 2013:126.
[11]	孙烈荣. 几种中药材田间杂草防控技术研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2014.
[12]	信小娟, 王黑子来, 张玉华, 等. 5种除草剂防除黄芪田杂草的效果比较[J]. 防护林科技, 2015(3):14-15.
[13]	TAKANO H K, OVEJERO R F L, BELCHIOR G G, et al. ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: Mechanism of action,resistance evolution and stewardship[J]. Scientia Agricola, 2021, 78(1):20190102.
[14]	魏鹏. 蒙古黄芪病虫草害不同防治方法对药材产量和品质的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2020.
[15]	黄宗昌, 师尚礼, 汪睿, 等. 不同饲草作物间作模式对地上生物量及竞争力的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(11):2284-2292.
[16]	牛树君, 赵峰, 余海涛, 等. 4种除草剂对黄芪田阔叶杂草的防效及安全性[J]. 农药, 2022, 61(3):225-229.
[17]	刘恩艳. 化学除草剂在中药材种植中的应用[J]. 天津农林科技, 2015(4):16-17.
[18]	赵喜进. 中药材田如何选用除草剂[J]. 农村新技术, 2016(11):37-38.
[19]	刘华, 李明, 田永强, 等. 不同除草剂对黄芪生长的影响及对杂草防控效果的研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021(12):74-77,83.
[20]	袁志强, 丁建云, 郭永旺, 等. 柴胡田封闭化学除草试验[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2004, 24(1):30-31.
[21]	王向东, 马艳芝, 客绍英. 不同除草剂处理对柴胡产量和质量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(4):132-137. doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2017.0575
[22]	兰献敏, 冉海燕, 何秀龙, 等. 4种茎叶处理除草剂对半夏田杂草的防除效果[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(1):340-345.

Weed Control Efficacy of Different Herbicides in Astragalus membranaceus Fields and The Influences on Astragalus membranaceus Biomass and Medicinal Material Yield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 22

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Ying, WANG Lifang, ZHANG Tenglong, ZHONG Huachen, SONG Jie, GUO Chenyang, LIU Jialin. A Comparative Study on Milk Yield and Quality of Dairy Cows in Different Regions of Inner Mongolia [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2024, 45(2): 82-87.
[2]	ZENG Jia, GUO Jiaqing, XIA Fangshan, LI Yinlin, BAI Chaorui, LI Hanjing. Effects of Different Plant Spacing and Row Spacing on Seed Yield and Related Agronomic Traits of Bothriochloa ischaemum [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2024, 45(1): 63-70.
[3]	LU Xiangyi, XU Yupeng, YAN Xudong, QU Xinyue, ZHANG Haifeng, TENG Xiao, XIAO Yu, CAO Peixia. Screening of Soybean Varieties Suitable for Silage Maize - Forage Soybean Intercropping Model [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(6): 47-56.
[4]	YANG Xuan,LI Guo-liang,JIA Peng-fei,HOU Qing-qing,XIA Fang-shan. Responses of Forage Oat Yields to Precipitation Changes under Different Precipitation Year Patterns [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(1): 80-90.
[5]	HAN Zhan-qiang,MA Ya-jiao,HUO Lei,LI Peng-wei,LIU Chang-chun,MENG Yan-fei. Research Progress on Biological Activities of Astragalus membranaceus and Its Application in Livestock and Poultry Production [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2022, 43(6): 48-52.
[6]	GUO Chen-yang, LIU Jia-lin, ZHONG Hua-chen, WANG Li-fang. Optimization of Preparation Conditions of Ethanol Extracts from Artemisia scoparia [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2022, 43(3): 36-41.
[7]	MA Yu-hui, Jubek·Kanitibek, Nulan·Akyazi, LI Hai. Comparison of Monthly Milk Yield and Milk Composition of Different Breeds of Lactating Mares [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2022, 43(3): 73-76.
[8]	ZHANG Jian-wen, ZHANG Long-long, ZHANG Quan, YANG Xing-wen, CHEN Jian, LIU Fu-yuan, NIU Jun-peng, WANG Quan-zhen. Analysis and Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Yields of 57 Alfalfa（Medicago sativa）Germplasms [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2022, 43(2): 69-77.
[9]	Surina, Turigenbaiyila. Agronomic Traits and Biological Yields of Two Maize Varieties in Different Harvest Periods [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2022, 43(1): 23-30.
[10]	SHI Yue, YANG Dong-sheng, FANG Yong-yu, CHAI Wen-juan, LIU Shuan-cheng, HE Ru-tong. Correlation and Path Analysis Between Agronomic Traits and Yield of Sorghum-Sudan Hybrid Grass [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2022, 43(1): 63-67.
[11]	BAI Lin, CHENG Li-xin, LI Yun-hua, Fengying, YUE Lin-fang, CHANG Jing, Baohua, WANG Zhi-ming, YU Zhao-hui, LI Jing-shu. Effect of Combinative Application of Organic Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Nutritional Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2021, 42(2): 72-79.
[12]	ZHOU Zhong-yi, WEI Yuan, BAI Yu-ting, QUE Guo-ping, TIAN Ye, WEI Zhi-jun. Effect of Mowing Technique on Yield and Quality of Forage Grass in Leymus chinensis Mowing Meadow in Hulun Buir City [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2021, 42(2): 97-102.
[13]	GUO Chen-yang, WANG Li-fang, SONG Jie. Analysis on Inter-monthly Variation of Milk Yields and Quality Indicators of Dairy Cows in Hulun Buir Region in Year 2019 [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2021, 42(1): 60-62.
[14]	HOU Fu-yin, MA Meng-meng, CHEN Ying-jiang, LU Jian, WANG Bin-kun, YANG Zhi-qing, XI Hong-sheng, JIN Chong-fu, SHI Kai, CHEN Chang-kuan, AN Chen. Effects of Fermentation Decomposed Manure Fertilizer from Laying Hens on Tomato Growth Traits, Yield, Quality and Soil [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2020, 41(6): 56-61.
[15]	Wurilege, LI Jiu-yue, TIAN Feng, WANG Li, GAO Yuan, Siqinmenghe, XUE Shu-yuan. Effects of Supplementary Feeding in the Perinatal Period on Lactation Performance of Grazing Mongolian Ewes and Growth Performance of Their Lambs [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2020, 41(5): 27-32.