有机肥及其与化肥配施对紫花苜蓿产量和品质的影响

doi:10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2021.02.014

Abstract

Abstract: [Objective] To determine the optimal fertilization scheme for alfalfa cultivation and to improve its production performance and nutritional quality. [Method] The alfalfa variety of Medicago sativa L. cv. Zhongmu No. 2 was used as experimental material, chemical fertilizer and different kinds of organic fertilizer （farmmade organic fertilizer, vermicompost fertilizer, commercial organic fertilizer） were used as experimental fertilizer. A total of fourteen treatments were included: 1-4 treatments received single application of chemical fertilizer or different kinds of organic fertilizer, 5-7 treatments received combinative application of 1/2 chemical fertilizer and 1/2 different kinds of organic fertilizer, 8-10 treatments received combinative application of 1/2 chemical fertilizer and different kinds of organic fertilizer, 11-13 treatments received combinative application of 1/2 chemical fertilizer and 2 times different organic fertilizer. No fertilizer was used for the control treatment （CK）. There were 3 replicates （plots） for each treatment, and a total of 42 plots were included. The growth and nutritional quality of alfalfa of three cutting times were measured and compared under different fertilization treatments. [Result] Under three cutting times, compared with CK, different fertilization treatments （1-13） significantly （P<0.05） improved the hay yield, plant height, soluble sugar content, total chlorophyll content and crude protein content of alfalfa, and significantly （P<0.05） reduced the neutral detergent fiber content and acid detergent fiber content. Except that the treatment 4 in the first cutting did not reach the significant level, the relative feeding value of alfalfa of different fertilization treatments was all significantly （P<0.05） higher than that of CK. In the first cutting, the improvement effect of 1/2 chemical fertilizer + farmmade organic fertilizer （treatment 8） on growth and nutritional quality of alfalfa was only second to that of chemical fertilizer （treatment 1）. In the second cutting, treatment 8 had the best improvement effect on growth and nutritional quality of alfalfa. The hay yield, plant height, soluble sugar content, total chlorophyll content, crude protein content and relative feed value of treatment 8 were significantly （P<0.05） higher than those of the other treatments, and the neutral detergent fiber content and acid detergent fiber content of treatment 8 were significantly （P<0.05） lower than those of the other treatments. [Conclusion] Taking the improvement effects of different fertilization ratios on middle- and late-stage growth and nutritional quality of alfalfa as well as chemical fertilizer application reduction into consideration, 1/2 fertilizer + homemade organic fertilizer is recommended as the optimal fertilization scheme.

Key words: chemical fertilizer, organic fertilizer, alfalfa, yield, quality

CLC Number:

BAI Lin, CHENG Li-xin, LI Yun-hua, Fengying, YUE Lin-fang, CHANG Jing, Baohua, WANG Zhi-ming, YU Zhao-hui, LI Jing-shu. Effect of Combinative Application of Organic Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Nutritional Quality of Alfalfa[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2021, 42(2): 72-79.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/xmysl/EN/10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2021.02.014

https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/xmysl/EN/Y2021/V42/I2/72

References

[1] 肖燕子,乌仁其其格,孟凯,等.配方施肥对苜蓿生产性能的影响[J].中国草地学报,2020,42(1):174-178.
[2] 冯玲霞. 不同施肥配比对紫花苜蓿性状及产量的影响[J].北方园艺,2017(6):85-90.
[3] 汪茜,陈本建,张丽珍.有机肥与化肥配施对低产田苜蓿产量、品质和经济效益的影响[J].草原与草坪,2015,35(4):75-79.
[4] 马晖玲,卢欣石,曹致中,等.紫花苜蓿不同栽培品种植株再生的研究[J].草业学报,2004,13(6):99-105.
[5] 周慧,史海滨,徐昭,等.化肥有机肥配施对盐渍化土壤氨挥发及玉米产量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(7):1649-1656.
[6] 宋以玲,于建,陈士更,等.化肥减量配施生物有机肥对玉米生长及土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].化肥工业,2019,46(1):55-61.
[7] MANDAL K G,HATI K M,MISRA A K.Biomass yield and energy analysis of soybean production in relation to fertilizer-NPK and organic manure[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2009,33:1670-1679.
[8] WANG N,NAN H Y,FENG K Y.Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer application on soil microbial biomass,enzyme activity and cotton yield[J].The Journal of Applied Ecology,2020,31(1):173-181.
[9] 吴家梅,纪雄辉,彭华,等.不同有机肥对稻田温室气体排放及产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(4):162-169.
[10] 柏琼芝,肖石江,王晓瑞,等.化肥减量配施生物有机肥对秋马铃薯产量的影响[J].土壤与作物,2019,8(2):158-165.
[11] 郑福丽,李国生,李燕,等.不同有机—无机肥配施模式对设施辣椒产量及养分利用的影响[J].山东农业科学,2020,52(11):105-110.
[12] 宋以玲,于建,陈士更,等.化肥减量配施生物有机肥对油菜生长及土壤微生物和酶活性影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(1):352-360.
[13] 白红梅,姜伟,薛国萍,等.不同肥料配比对白菜产量和品质的影响[J].北方农业学报,2020,48(5):104-108.
[14] 张秋萍,荣利,周鹤,等.有机肥与无机肥配施对萝卜产量和品质的影响[J].上海蔬菜,2020,78(6):56-59.
[15] LIANG B,HUANG K,FU Y L,et al.Effect of combined application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer in different ratios on growth,yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J].Asian Agricultural Research,2017,9(12):43-51.
[16] 肖燕子. 不同苜蓿品种产量、品质评价及优选品种密度与肥料效应的研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2016.
[17] 刘艳楠,刘晓静.施肥对两个紫花苜蓿品种生产性能及营养品质的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2014,49(1):111-120.
[18] 彭运生,刘恩.关于提取叶绿素方法的比较研究[J].北京农业大学学报,1992,18(3):247-250.
[19] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[20] 秦琳,黄世群,仲伶俐,等.杜马斯燃烧法和凯氏定氮法在稻米蛋白质检测中的对比研究[J].中国稻米,2019,25(5):69-74.
[21] 李博,张丹丹,程景,等.不同方法测定饲料中的中性洗涤纤维与酸性洗涤纤维含量分析[J].中国畜牧杂志,2020,56(12):187-190.
[22] VOGEL K P,PEDERSEN J F,MASTERSON S D,et al.Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF,ADF,and IVDMD forage analysis[J].Crop Science,1999,39(1):276-279.
[23] 王洋,崔国文,尹航,等.施肥对紫花苜蓿生产性能及营养品质的影响[J].草业科学,2019,36(3):793-803.
[24] 汪茜,王生文,陈伟,等.施肥对民乐低产田苜蓿产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J].草业科学,2016,33(2):230-239.
[25] 韩文林,杨琴霞,魏玉林.施肥对紫花苜蓿产草量的影响实验[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,2016,46(18):111-112.
[26] 贡嘎桑布.不同施肥处理对紫花苜蓿产量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(26):155,215.
[27] 丁洋,石凤翎,刘昊.在土默川平原地区配方施肥对苜蓿牧草产量的影响[J].草原与草业,2016,28(3):42-50.
[28] 何飞,赵忠祥,康俊梅,等.氮磷钾配比施肥对紫花苜蓿草产量及品质的影响[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(5):24-32.
[29] 胡华锋,介晓磊,郭孝,等.氮磷钾及微量元素与有机肥配施对紫花苜蓿饲草产量及品质的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2010,41(1):98-101.
[30] 贾珺,韩清芳,周芳,等.氮磷配比对旱地紫花苜蓿产量构成因子及营养成分的影响[J].中国草地学报,2009,31(3):77-82.
[31] 张学洲,兰吉勇,张荟荟,等.不同施肥配比对多叶型紫花苜蓿产量、品质和效益的影响[J].现代农业科技,2016(4):270-273.
[32] 庞宇飞,张高升,王志旺,等.蚯蚓粪的应用现状研究[J].现代农业科技,2017(12):196-198.

Effect of Combinative Application of Organic Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer on Yield and Nutritional Quality of Alfalfa

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Dongyang, Wuni′er, Nana, SUN Lin, YANG Baozhu, LI E, XUE Yanlin. Effects of Adding Lactic Acid Bacteria and Sugar on Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of Wheat Straw Yellow Storage at Different Compaction Densities [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2024, 45(2): 9-19.
[2]	LI Xiaodong, YU Erru, HONG Liping, SHANG Yishun, PEI Chengjiang, LUO Jinping, CHEN Caijun. Effects of Different Mixing Ratios of Corn Straw and Spent Flammulina velutipes Substrate on Nutritional Quality and Mycotoxin Content of Fermented Total Mixed Ration [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2024, 45(2): 20-28.
[3]	ZHANG Ying, WANG Lifang, ZHANG Tenglong, ZHONG Huachen, SONG Jie, GUO Chenyang, LIU Jialin. A Comparative Study on Milk Yield and Quality of Dairy Cows in Different Regions of Inner Mongolia [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2024, 45(2): 82-87.
[4]	ZENG Jia, GUO Jiaqing, XIA Fangshan, LI Yinlin, BAI Chaorui, LI Hanjing. Effects of Different Plant Spacing and Row Spacing on Seed Yield and Related Agronomic Traits of Bothriochloa ischaemum [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2024, 45(1): 63-70.
[5]	GUO Chengyu, FANG Yongyu, YI Fengyan, SHI Zhidan, QIAO Huilei, LIU Fang, ZHAO Heping, ZHU Linfei, DING Haijun. Analysis and Evaluation on Grain Quality Traits of Forage Barley [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2024, 45(1): 79-84.
[6]	LU Xiangyi, XU Yupeng, YAN Xudong, QU Xinyue, ZHANG Haifeng, TENG Xiao, XIAO Yu, CAO Peixia. Screening of Soybean Varieties Suitable for Silage Maize - Forage Soybean Intercropping Model [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(6): 47-56.
[7]	WANG Zhen. Effects of Combined Application of Cattle Manure with Chemical Fertilizer on Copper and Zinc Contents in Soil and Silage Maize [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(5): 108-114.
[8]	Siqinmenghe , LI Shengli, SUN Haizhou, ZHANG Chunhua, ZHANG Le, ZHANG Yanning, BAI Yu. Strengthening ′Big Data+′ Based Science and Technology Service to Promote High-quality Development of Cashmere Goat Industry-A Case Study of Ordos City, Inner Mongolia [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(4): 1-9.
[9]	YANG Hang, LIU Xu. Research Progress in Candidate Genes Related to Meat Quality Traits of Livestock and Poultry [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(4): 55-60.
[10]	KONG Hao, TIAN Rufang, CAO Guiyun, MENG Zhaoqing. Research Progress in Quality and Safety Evaluation of Asini Corii Colla [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(4): 109-115.
[11]	LUO Huan, LUO Jiaolan, LIANG Qiong, YI Xianfeng, HUANG Shiyang. Effects of Different Addition Levels of Compound Bacterial Inoculants on Nutritional Value and Fermentation Quality of Pennisetum purpureum × P. glaucum cv. Reyan No. 4 Silage [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(3): 27-32.
[12]	LI Xue, YIN Dabao, LIU Zhiyao, WAGN Jian, WANG Junjie. Weed Control Efficacy of Different Herbicides in Astragalus membranaceus Fields and The Influences on Astragalus membranaceus Biomass and Medicinal Material Yield [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(3): 89-95.
[13]	YIN Yuzhou, WANG Bo, XIA Fangshan, WANG Congcong, CHEN Yilin, ZHAO Ping. Effects of Selenium Priming Duration on Antioxidant Capacity of Different Parts of Alfalfa Seedlings [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(3): 96-102.
[14]	LUO Jiaolan, LUO Huan, ZENG Jun, YI Xianfeng, QIU Jinbao, HUANG Shiyang. Effects of Adding Different Proportions of Cassava Alcohol Residue on Fermentation Quality of Micro-silage of Pennisetum purpureum Schum. cv. Gui Min Yin [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(2): 44-49.
[15]	LIU Yongjun, LI Mengji, MA Yanfen, WANG Dezhi. Effects of Different Microbial Agents and Compaction Densities on Nutritional Components and Fermentation Quality of Corn Silage [J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2023, 44(2): 55-60.