北方农业学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 30-30.

• 土壤肥料·节水灌溉 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同节水种植模式对玉米产量的影响

李金琴[1];王宇飞[1];侯旭光[2];李媛媛[3];陈杰辉[4];李雪峰[1];吕岩[1]   

  1. [1]通辽市农业技术推广站,内蒙古通辽028000;[2]内蒙古农牧业科学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010031;[3]内蒙古民族大学农学院,内蒙古通辽028042;[4]通辽市厚德种业有限责任公司,内蒙古通辽 028000
  • 出版日期:2017-08-20 发布日期:2017-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 李金琴
  • 作者简介:李金琴(1965—),女,研究员,学士,主要从事作物遗传育种、栽培与农业技术推广工作。

Effects of different water-saving cropping models on maize yield

  • Online:2017-08-20 Published:2017-08-20

摘要: 通过比较分析不同节水模式对玉米产量的影响,探索出通辽市气候条件下玉米最佳节水模式及适宜的灌水量。采用不同灌水量下无膜浅埋滴灌(SI)、普通管灌(PI)及膜下滴灌(DI)的对比试验,分析了不同节水模式下的产量与节水效果的关系,结果表明:不同节水模式玉米产量排序为DI总灌水量235mm>SI总灌水量235mm>SI总灌水量300mm>SI总灌水量170mm>PI总灌水量280mm>SI总灌水量105mm>SI总灌水量40mm;其中以SI总灌水量235mm为最佳模式,播种至成熟期总需水量为505.2mm,与PI相比节水45mm,节水率达到16.07%,与DI相比减少了地膜使用,实现零污染。

Abstract: The best water-saving model and the appropriate irrigation amount of maize was explored under the climate condition in Tongliao by comparing and analyzing the effects of different water-saving models on maize yield.The relationship between maize yield and water-saving effect under different water-saving model s were analyzed according to contrast experiment of shallow subsurface drip irrigation without mulch(SI),pipe irrigation(PI)and drip irrigation under mulch(DI).The results showed that the sort of maize yields under different water-saving models was DI 235 mm>SI 235 mm>SI 300 mm>SI 170 mm>PI 280 mm>SI 105 mm>SI 40mm.SI 235 mm was the best water-saving model,and the total water requirement from sowing to maturity was 505.2 mm,the total water drop is 235.0 mm.SI 235mm had water conservation 45 mm,and the saving water rate was 16.07%compared with PI;the cost of mulch was also saved compared with DI,thereby realizing zero pollution.

中图分类号: 

  • S513