不同施肥处理对阴山北麓旱作区土壤肥力及马铃薯产量的影响

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2021.02.06

Abstract

Abstract: 【Objective】To study the effects of different fertilization treatments on soil fertility and potato yield in the dry farming area at the northern piedmont of Yinshan Mountain,and to provide the basis for the construction of soil fertilization mode in the area.【Methods】In Wuchuan Dry Farming Experimental Station of Inner Mongolia,combining the positioning test and laboratory analysis,NPK,organic fertilizer,NPK+organic fertilizer and no fertilization（CK） treatments were set up to analyze soil physical properties,contents of soil organic matter,total nitrogen and available nutrients,potato yield and fertilizer contribution rate in 0-40 cm soil layer under different fertilization treatments.【Results】Different fertilization treatments could effectively decrease soil bulk density and increase soil total porosity. Among them,organic fertilizer and NPK+organic fertilizer had significant improvement effect on soil physical properties（P<0.05）. The soil bulk density decreased by 13.25% and 10.60% compared with CK,respectively,and the total porosity increased by 17.55% and 15.77% compared with CK,respectively. The effects of different fertilization treatments on soil nutrient contents in different soil layers were different. Organic fertilizer application alone could significantly increase soil organic matter and total nitrogen contents in 0-10 cm soil layer（P<0.05）,which were 42.96% and 38.68% higher than that of CK,respectively. NPK+organic fertilizer treatment could significantly increase soil organic matter and total nitrogen content in 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm soil layers by 70.70%-78.33% and 73.53%-82.08% compared with CK,respectively. Organic fertilizer and NPK+organic fertilizer had significant difference on soil rapid effect nutrient content（P<0.05）. Compared with CK,the content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen,effective phosphorus and available potassium in 0-10,10-20 and 20-40 cm soil layers increased by 45.90%-157.84%,4.80-7.67 mg/kg and 59.66-179.66 mg/kg,respectively. NPK,organic fertilizer and NPK+organic fertilizer could significantly improve potato yield and marketable potato rate,and NPK+organic fertilizer was the best one. Potato yield and marketable potato rate increased by 171.64% and 50.87 percentage points respectively,and fertilizer contribution rate was 63.18%.【Conclusion】In order to improve soil fertility steadily,combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers,and the organic fertilizer needed to be promoted in the dry farming area at the northern piedmont of Yinshan Mountain.

Key words: The dry farming area at the northern piedmont of Yinshan Mountain, Organic fertilization, NPK, Soil fertility, Potato, Yield

CLC Number:

S147.2

JING Yupeng, ZHAO Peiyi, KANG Wenqin, LIAN Haifei, ZHANG Jun, LI Yanfang, LIANG Junmei, YU Weizhuo, DUAN Yu, LI Lei. Effects of different fertilization measures on soil fertility and potato yield in the dry farming area at the northern piedmont of Yinshan Mountain[J].Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2021, 49(2): 36-43.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2021.02.06

https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/Y2021/V49/I2/36

References

[1] 张北赢,陈天林,王兵.长期施用化肥对土壤质量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(11):182-187.
[2] ZHANG H L,BILL R.Oklahoma Soil Fertility Handbook[M].Durant:Oklahoma State University,2006.
[3] 叶回春,张世文,黄元仿,等.北京延庆盆地农田表层土壤肥力评价及其空间变异[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(15):3151-3160.
[4] 邵云,王小洁,张紧紧,等.小麦-玉米轮作区耕作及培肥方式对麦田土壤养分和小麦产量的影响[J].华北农学报,2013,28(3):152-158.
[5] 聂军,郑圣先,杨曾平,等.长期施用化肥、猪粪和稻草对红壤性水稻土物理性质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(7):1404-1413.
[6] 黄婷,荀卫兵,张瑞福.长期不同施肥对北方旱地轮作土壤有机质和作物产量影响的抽样调查[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(2):253-260.
[7] 沈善敏. 长期土壤肥力试验的科学价值[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1995,1(1):1-9.
[8] 孙波,朱兆良,牛栋.农田长期生态过程的长期试验研究进展与展望[J].土壤,2007,39(6):849-854.
[9] 徐祖祥. 长期不同施肥对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].浙江农业科学,2007(4):439-441.
[10] 张奇春,王光火.长期不同施肥下杂交稻与常规稻的产量与土壤养分平衡[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2006,12(3):340-345.
[11] 陈欢,曹承富,孔令聪,等.长期施肥下淮北砂姜黑土区小麦产量稳定性研究[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(13):2580-2590.
[12] 韩晓增,王凤仙,王凤菊,等.长期施用有机肥对黑土肥力及作物产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(1):66-71.
[13] 林治安,赵秉强,袁亮,等.长期定位施肥对土壤养分与作物产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(8):2809-2819.
[14] 陈鸽,汤春纯,李祖胜,等.不同施肥措施对洞庭湖区旱地肥力及作物产量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(5):689-697.
[15] WANG J Y,YAN X Y,GONG W.Effect of long-term fertilization on soil productivity on the North China Plain[J]. Pedosphere,2015,25(3):450-458.
[16] 杨曾平,张杨珠,曾希柏,等.不合理施肥引起高产稻田土壤退化研究[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,33(2):225-231.
[17] 汪建飞,邢素芝.农田土壤施用化肥的负效应及其防治对策[J].农业环境保护,1998,17(1):40-43.
[18] 张秀芝,高洪军,彭畅,等.长期有机培肥黑土有机碳、全氮及玉米产量稳定性的变化特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(9):1473-1481.
[19] 高洪军,朱平,彭畅,等.黑土有机培肥对土地生产力及土壤肥力影响研究[J].吉林农业大学学报,2007,29(1):65-69.
[20] 查燕,武雪萍,张会民,等.长期有机无机配施黑土土壤有机碳对农田基础地力提升的影响[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(23):4649-4659.
[21] 夏文建,王萍,刘秀梅,等.长期施肥对红壤旱地有机碳、氮和磷的影响[J].江西农业学报,2017,29(12):27-31.
[22] 曹宏杰,汪景宽.长期不同施肥处理对棕壤不同组分有机碳的影响[J].国土与自然资源研究,2011(6):85-88.
[23] 许咏梅,刘骅,王西和.长期施肥下新疆灰漠土有机碳及作物产量演变[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2016,24(2):154-162.
[24] 赵玉皓,张艳杰,李贵春,等.长期不同施肥下褐土有机碳储量及活性碳组分[J].生态学杂志,2016,35(7):1826-1833.
[25] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:152-200.
[26] 孙永健,杨志远,孙园园,等.成都平原两熟区水氮管理模式与磷钾肥配施对杂交稻冈优725产量及品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(1):17-28.
[27] 廖育林,郑圣先,聂军,等.长期施用化肥和稻草对红壤水稻土肥力和生产力持续性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(10):3541-3550.
[28] 李忠芳,徐明岗,张会民,等.长期施肥和不同生态条件下我国作物产量可持续性特征[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(5):1264-1269.
[29] 周宝库. 长期施肥条件下黑土肥力变化特征研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2011.
[30] 高洪军,彭畅,张秀芝,等.长期不同施肥对东北黑土区玉米产量稳定性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2015,48(23):4790-4799.
[31] 吴福强,徐臣善.不同类型钾肥对马铃薯产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J].山东农业科学,2014,46(6):98-100.
[32] 陈功楷,权伟,朱建军.不同钾肥量与密度对马铃薯产量及商品率的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(6):166-169.
[33] 王文丽,马忠明,李娟,等.不同钾肥用量对马铃薯产量、品质和效益的影响[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(8):130-134.
[34] 高翔,李成亮,张民,等.钾肥种类及用量对马铃薯生长和品质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(2):143-148.
[35] 王祥珍. 钾肥和专用肥对马铃薯产量及品质的影响[J].杂粮作物,2003,23(6):359-361.
[36] 刘建松,王鹏,陈继东,等.我国土壤养分概况及施肥对其影响[J].现代农业科技,2011(1):298-299.

Effects of different fertilization measures on soil fertility and potato yield in the dry farming area at the northern piedmont of Yinshan Mountain

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WU Liqiang, WANG Xingfen, ZHANG Yan, KE Huifeng, LIU Sujuan, LI Zhikun, XU Dongyong, YANG Jun, SUN Zhengwen, GU Qishen, CHEN Bin, WANG Hongzhe, LU Huaiyu, ZHANG Guiyin, MA Zhiying. Creation and application of new cotton varieties with early maturity,high yield,good fibre quality,high adversity resistance and suitability for mechanization [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(6): 1-9.
[2]	DU Erxiao, LI Huanchun, REN Yongfeng, KANG Wenqin, ZHENG Na, BAI Hongmei, ZHAO Yiwen, ZHAO Peiyi. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and substitution on potato field soil physicochemical properties,potato yield and potato quality [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(6): 10-17.
[3]	LI Baocheng, KANG Wenqin, REN Yongfeng, ZHANG Dejian, LI Juan, ZHANG Xiangqian, ZHAO Zhiyuan, HAN Yunfei, ZHANG Le, SAN Xintong. Effects of drought on the growth and yield of different potato varieties [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(5): 40-50.
[4]	ZHAO Li, FAN Mingyuan, XIE Guangming, LU Jingying, ZHANG Qi, SUN Xiaojing, GUO Hongxia, DENG Yan, WANG Chuangyun. Analysis on photosynthetic characteristics，dry matter accumulation，and yield of different spring maize varieties in dryland [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 11-19.
[5]	DAI Lu, ZHANG Yafeng, HE Lianzhen, DONG Yongwen, QIN Yongqiang. Research on nutrient elements characteristics in potato-soil system in eastern Qinghai [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 20-27.
[6]	ZHANG Lili, XUE Bingdong, FAN Ye, MO Jiaojiao, ZHAO Xinyu, YANG Hailong, FU Jun, JIANG Ying, QI Hua, WANG Pu. Effects of continuous application of soil conditioner on the growth，development and yield components of maize in acidic soil in the southeastern region of Liaoning [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 38-47.
[7]	YU Dawei, LI Lijun, LI Haidong, YAN Liwei, HUANG Shuo, ZHAO Tiefeng, LI Xin, HONG Zhong, LI Xiaoping, GUO Yongpeng. The effect of fertilization methods on yield and yield traits of millet [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 48-55.
[8]	LIU Xiaoyue, REN Yongfeng, ZHAO Zhiyuan, ZHANG Na, MIAO Xinyue, ZHANG Shu, HAN Yunfei, ZHANG Peng, ZHAO Peiyi. Effects of drip irrigation on water use and yield of quinoa in the north foot of Yinshan Mountains in Inner Mongolia [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 56-63.
[9]	ZHAO Li, HE Xianfang, DENG Cheng, WANG Jianlai. Analysis of yield gap of wheat following rice in Anhui Province [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(3): 1-11.
[10]	ZHAO Yuanzheng, ZHANG Bin, XU Limin, WANG Dong, PENG Jingwen, WANG Yu, ZHANG Peng, HAN Shengli, LIANG Dongchao. Control efficacy of microbial agents on potato black scurf and Verticillium wilt [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(3): 72-77.
[11]	CHENG Zhipeng, ZHANG Chengze, WANG Fugui, WANG Zhen, ZHANG Yuezhong, YAN Liwei, LIANG Hongwei, YANG Zhihong, GAO Julin, WANG Zhigang. Effects of tillage methods on Inner Mongolia dry farming regions soil moisture,temperature and maize yield [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 22-32.
[12]	FAN Yafang, CHEN Wenjin, KONG Qingquan, HE Xiaoyong, GUO Chen, LIU Jian, ZHANG Lijun, GUO Liming, HE Youquan, HU Ruifeng. Study on the application effect and recommended dosage of nitrogen,phosphorus,and potassium fertilizers on chickpea [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 41-48.
[13]	WANG Li, SUN Lulong, LI Zhifeng, ZHANG Xueliang, GUO Xiongxiong, LIANG Jun. Effect of different fertilizer treatments on Ruiyang apple yield and quality [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 49-55.
[14]	LI Rui, LIANG Jibao, BAI Wei, FENG Baili, QI Dongliang. Effects of rotation on photosynthetic characteristics,yield and benefit of dry land millet and bean [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 56-64.
[15]	ZHANG Hao, GAO Julin, YU Xiaofang, MA Daling, HU Shuping. Effects of deep ploughing straw returning on root morphology and yield of maize in saline-alkali soil [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(1): 1-15.