干旱对不同马铃薯品种生长和产量的影响

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.05.04

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】To investigate the effects of drought on the growth，yield of different potato varieties and evaluate their drought resistance.【Methods】Plant height，stem diameter，leaf area index，chlorophyll content（SPAD value），dry matter accumulation，root-shoot ratio and yield were measured for 8 potato varieties treated with normal irrigation and drought stress. Using principal component analysis and membership function method，the comprehensive drought resistance measure（D） was calculated. The drought resistance of different potato varieties were then comprehensively evaluated.【Results】Under drought stress，the plant height，stem diameter，leaf area index and yield of the different potato varieties were all lower than those of normal irrigation treatment，while SPAD values were higher. The indexes of Dafeng No. 10 and Xisen No. 6 had no significant differences with normal irrigation treatment or small decreases，while the indexes of Luyin No.1，Dafeng No. 9 and Jizhangshu No. 12 were significantly lower than those of normal irrigation treatment. Different varieties had clear differences in the indexes. Xisen No. 6 had the best plant height and stem diameter of 64.20 cm and 12.63 mm，respectively. Luyin No. 1 had the lowest plant height of 49.53 cm. Jizhangshu No. 12 had the smallest stem diameter of 10.13 mm. Huasong No. 7 had the highest SPAD value of 53.03，while Jizhangshu No. 12 had the lowest at 39.73. Dafeng No. 10 performed best in leaf area index，dry matter accumulation，root-shoot ratio and yield of 1.88，170.80 g/plant，0.12，and 34 750 kg/hm²，respectively. Jizhangshu No. 12 had the worst leaf area index，root-shoot ratio and yield of 0.94，0.08，and 18 750 kg/hm². At 121.78 g/plant，Dafeng No. 9 had the lowest dry matter accumulation. Dafeng No. 10 and Xisen No. 6 had high drought resistance indexes of 0.986 and 0.756，respectively. Two principal components were obtained through principal component analysis：the first contributed 57.807% and the eigenvalue was 5.203，and the second contributed 20.281% and the eigenvalue was 1.825. Under drought stress，the comprehensive drought resistance measure of Dafeng No. 10 was the largest，1.000.【Conclusion】Based on the growth，yield，and the comprehensive drought resistance measure of different potato varieties，Dafeng No. 10 showed strong drought resistance.

Key words: Potato, Drought stress, Growth indexes, Yield, Drought resistance

CLC Number:

S532

LI Baocheng, KANG Wenqin, REN Yongfeng, ZHANG Dejian, LI Juan, ZHANG Xiangqian, ZHAO Zhiyuan, HAN Yunfei, ZHANG Le, SAN Xintong. Effects of drought on the growth and yield of different potato varieties[J].Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(5): 40-50.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.05.04

https://journal30.magtechjournal.com/bfnyxb/EN/Y2023/V51/I5/40

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

References 33

[1]	SPOONER D M, MCLEANK, RAMSAYG, et al. A single domestication for potato based on multilocus amplified fragment length polymorphism genotyping[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(41):14694-14699. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507400102 pmid: 16203994
[2]	杨宏羽. 马铃薯种质资源的抗旱性评价和抗旱机理研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2016.
[3]	刘维刚, 唐勋, 付学, 等. 马铃薯抗旱性研究进展[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2022, 36(4):358-369.
[4]	张海燕, 解备涛, 姜常松, 等. 不同抗旱性甘薯品种叶片生理性状差异及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2):518-528. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.14031
[5]	余斌, 杨宏羽, 王丽, 等. 引进马铃薯种质资源在干旱半干旱区的表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(1):63-74.
[6]	HIRUT B, SHLMELIS H, FENTAHUN M, et al. Combining ability of highland tropic adapted potato for tuber yield and yield components under drought[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(7):e0181541.
[7]	武新娟, 唐贵, 隋冬华, 等. 20个马铃薯品种抗旱性鉴定及评价指标筛选[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(3):47-51.
[8]	于佳乐. 18个马铃薯品种的抗旱性评价及遗传多样性分析[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2022.
[9]	李丰先, 罗磊, 李亚杰, 等. 基于PCA和隶属函数法分析的马铃薯创新种质抗旱性鉴定与分类[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(11):141-147.
[10]	夏丹. 植物抗旱生理研究进展与育种[J]. 现代园艺, 2020, 43(12):221-222.
[11]	张海燕, 解备涛, 汪宝卿, 等. 不同甘薯品种抗旱性评价及耐旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3):419-430. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84087
[12]	赵媛媛, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯抗旱种质资源的评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(2):633-642.
[13]	何文, 张秀芬, 郭素云, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对22份马铃薯种质的综合评价[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(3):80-86.
[14]	王优信, 延荣, 蔺明月, 等. 冀中北小麦品种抗旱性筛选研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(1):74-82.
[15]	田又升, 谢宗铭, 吴向东, 等. 水稻种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合鉴定[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(4):173-180.
[16]	王向东, 甄胜虎, 张凤琴. 甜糯玉米全生育期抗旱性鉴定指标的筛选与评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(5):41-49.
[17]	祁旭升, 刘章雄, 关荣霞, 等. 大豆成株期抗旱性鉴定评价方法研究[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(4):665-674.
[18]	姜波, 张晓莉, 任珂, 等. 马铃薯不同品种抗旱评价及生化指标[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2017, 31(2):71-76.
[19]	孙悦. 基于APSIM模型的华北一作区马铃薯生长发育及产量对干旱情景的响应[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2022.
[20]	YOSHIMURA K, SATO K, AOI N, et al. Cell-assisted lipotransfer for cosmetic breast augmentation:Supportive use of adipose-deived stem/stromal cells[J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020, 44(4):1258-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01819-7
[21]	李秀, 徐坤, 巩彪, 等. 生姜农艺性状与产量形成关系的多重分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(12):2431-2437. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.12.011
[22]	仲义, 梁煊赫, 高华援. 马铃薯主要农艺性状与单株产量的遗传相关及通径系数分析[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2009, 34(2):17-19.
[23]	张瑞玖, 马恢, 籍立杰, 等. 干旱胁迫对马铃薯品种生长及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15):34-39. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1175
[24]	孙慧, 王亚玲, 刘易, 等. 新疆地区马铃薯品种抗旱性比较及筛选[J]. 西北农业学报, 2021, 30(12):1787-1796.
[25]	马福林, 马玉花. 干旱胁迫对植物的影响及植物的响应机制[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43(4):391-399.
[26]	崔勇, 李培贵, 李珍, 等. 马铃薯干旱胁迫响应及抗旱综合技术研究进展[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2023(4):20-28.
[27]	叶胜拓. 苎麻抗旱生理生化指标研究及抗旱性鉴定[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2013.
[28]	张辉, 黄月, 邵雨晴, 等. 马铃薯响应干旱胁迫的生理和分子遗传机理研究现状与展望[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2022, 36(2):165-176.
[29]	张木清, 陈如凯. 作物抗旱分子生理与遗传改良[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
[30]	李忠旺, 陈玉梁, 罗俊杰, 等. 棉花抗旱品种筛选鉴定及抗旱性综合评价方法[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(1):240-247.
[31]	蔺豆豆, 赵桂琴, 琚泽亮, 等. 15份燕麦材料苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(11):108-121. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021219
[32]	杜培兵, 张永福, 白小东, 等. 主成分分析和隶属函数法对马铃薯品种抗旱性的评价[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(8):120-126.
[33]	张军. 小麦骨干亲本小偃22抗旱耐寒适应性分析及对其衍生品种的遗传贡献[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014.

Effects of drought on the growth and yield of different potato varieties

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 33

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WU Liqiang, WANG Xingfen, ZHANG Yan, KE Huifeng, LIU Sujuan, LI Zhikun, XU Dongyong, YANG Jun, SUN Zhengwen, GU Qishen, CHEN Bin, WANG Hongzhe, LU Huaiyu, ZHANG Guiyin, MA Zhiying. Creation and application of new cotton varieties with early maturity,high yield,good fibre quality,high adversity resistance and suitability for mechanization [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(6): 1-9.
[2]	DU Erxiao, LI Huanchun, REN Yongfeng, KANG Wenqin, ZHENG Na, BAI Hongmei, ZHAO Yiwen, ZHAO Peiyi. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and substitution on potato field soil physicochemical properties,potato yield and potato quality [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(6): 10-17.
[3]	HU Yulu, FENG Hui, REN Jiangling, LIU Yuhan, LIU Sichen, QIAO Zhijun, CAO Xiaoning. Effects of PEG simulated drought stress on the germination of different Panicum miliaceum L. varieties [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(6): 18-27.
[4]	ZHAO Li, FAN Mingyuan, XIE Guangming, LU Jingying, ZHANG Qi, SUN Xiaojing, GUO Hongxia, DENG Yan, WANG Chuangyun. Analysis on photosynthetic characteristics，dry matter accumulation，and yield of different spring maize varieties in dryland [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 11-19.
[5]	DAI Lu, ZHANG Yafeng, HE Lianzhen, DONG Yongwen, QIN Yongqiang. Research on nutrient elements characteristics in potato-soil system in eastern Qinghai [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 20-27.
[6]	ZHANG Lili, XUE Bingdong, FAN Ye, MO Jiaojiao, ZHAO Xinyu, YANG Hailong, FU Jun, JIANG Ying, QI Hua, WANG Pu. Effects of continuous application of soil conditioner on the growth，development and yield components of maize in acidic soil in the southeastern region of Liaoning [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 38-47.
[7]	YU Dawei, LI Lijun, LI Haidong, YAN Liwei, HUANG Shuo, ZHAO Tiefeng, LI Xin, HONG Zhong, LI Xiaoping, GUO Yongpeng. The effect of fertilization methods on yield and yield traits of millet [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 48-55.
[8]	LIU Xiaoyue, REN Yongfeng, ZHAO Zhiyuan, ZHANG Na, MIAO Xinyue, ZHANG Shu, HAN Yunfei, ZHANG Peng, ZHAO Peiyi. Effects of drip irrigation on water use and yield of quinoa in the north foot of Yinshan Mountains in Inner Mongolia [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(4): 56-63.
[9]	ZHAO Li, HE Xianfang, DENG Cheng, WANG Jianlai. Analysis of yield gap of wheat following rice in Anhui Province [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(3): 1-11.
[10]	ZHAO Yuanzheng, ZHANG Bin, XU Limin, WANG Dong, PENG Jingwen, WANG Yu, ZHANG Peng, HAN Shengli, LIANG Dongchao. Control efficacy of microbial agents on potato black scurf and Verticillium wilt [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(3): 72-77.
[11]	CHENG Zhipeng, ZHANG Chengze, WANG Fugui, WANG Zhen, ZHANG Yuezhong, YAN Liwei, LIANG Hongwei, YANG Zhihong, GAO Julin, WANG Zhigang. Effects of tillage methods on Inner Mongolia dry farming regions soil moisture,temperature and maize yield [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 22-32.
[12]	FAN Yafang, CHEN Wenjin, KONG Qingquan, HE Xiaoyong, GUO Chen, LIU Jian, ZHANG Lijun, GUO Liming, HE Youquan, HU Ruifeng. Study on the application effect and recommended dosage of nitrogen,phosphorus,and potassium fertilizers on chickpea [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 41-48.
[13]	WANG Li, SUN Lulong, LI Zhifeng, ZHANG Xueliang, GUO Xiongxiong, LIANG Jun. Effect of different fertilizer treatments on Ruiyang apple yield and quality [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 49-55.
[14]	LI Rui, LIANG Jibao, BAI Wei, FENG Baili, QI Dongliang. Effects of rotation on photosynthetic characteristics,yield and benefit of dry land millet and bean [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(2): 56-64.
[15]	ZHANG Hao, GAO Julin, YU Xiaofang, MA Daling, HU Shuping. Effects of deep ploughing straw returning on root morphology and yield of maize in saline-alkali soil [J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(1): 1-15.