畜牧与饲料科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 64-69.doi: 10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2025.06.009

• 畜牧经济与信息 • 上一篇    下一篇

高质量发展背景下区域畜牧业发展研究

刘雨桐, 沙米拉·色依提   

  1. 新疆大学,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830046
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-18 出版日期:2025-11-30 发布日期:2026-01-26
  • 通讯作者: 沙米拉·色依提(1982—),女,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为农业经济学。
  • 作者简介:刘雨桐(2000—),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为农业经济学。
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区社会科学基金项目“丝绸之路经济带背景下提升新疆特色农业竞争力路径研究”(17BJY032)

Research on the Development of Regional Animal Husbandry under the Background of High-quality Development

LIU Yutong, Shamila Seyiti   

  1. Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
  • Received:2025-08-18 Online:2025-11-30 Published:2026-01-26

摘要: [目的] 科学评估我国各地区畜牧业高质量发展水平,剖析我国不同区域畜牧业发展面临的核心问题,并提供合理的决策建议。[方法] 以创新、协调、绿色、共享4个高质量发展要素为一级指标,并相应地选取各自代表性变量作为二级指标,建立完整的评价指标体系。采用熵权TOPSIS模型对2012—2023年我国31个省区市(除港澳台地区)的畜牧业高质量发展水平进行实证研究。[结果] 创新发展水平和协调发展水平的权重最高,反映出我国在推动畜牧业高质量发展过程中对创新与协调发展的高度重视。在具体指标层面,各级畜牧站技术人员总数、从业人员劳动生产率与牛肉产量是影响我国畜牧业高质量发展水平的重要因素。受资源状况、科技水平、供给结构等因素的制约,2012—2023年全国各地区畜牧业高质量发展得分最高不超过0.6;河南、山东、河北、内蒙古、新疆和辽宁的畜牧业高质量发展水平较高,而位于西北、西南地区的贵州、重庆、宁夏、青海和西藏得分明显落后,其他省份基本稳定处于中间水平,总体呈现出东北部与中部部分地区优于西北和西南地区。[结论] 各地区要加大对畜牧业的投入、加强地区合作、延伸产业链条,推动全国畜牧业实现协同高质量发展。

关键词: 畜牧业, 高质量发展, 熵权TOPSIS模型, 评价指标体系

Abstract: [Objective] The study aimed to scientifically evaluate the high-quality development level of animal husbandry in different regions of China, analyze the key issues faced by regional animal husbandry development, and propose reasonable policy recommendations. [Methods] Based on four key elements of high-quality development-innovation, coordination, greenness, and sharing-a complete evaluation index system was constructed, with representative variables selected as secondary indicators. The entropy weight-TOPSIS model was applied to empirically assess the high-quality development level of animal husbandry in 31 provinces (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) of China from 2012 to 2023. [Results] Innovation and coordination development levels received the highest weights, reflecting the emphasis placed on innovation and coordinated development in promoting high-quality animal husbandry in China. At the specific indicator level, the total number of technicians in animal husbandry stations, labor productivity of employees, and beef output were the important factors influencing the high-quality development of animal husbandry. Constrained by resources, technology, and supply structure, the high-quality development scores of animal husbandry in all regions during 2012-2023 did not exceed 0.6. Provinces such as Henan, Shandong, Hebei, Inner Mongolia, Xinjiang, and Liaoning showed relatively high levels of high-quality development in animal husbandry, while provinces in the northwest and southwest, including Guizhou, Chongqing, Ningxia, Qinghai, and Xizang, scored significantly lower, and other provinces generally remained at intermediate levels. In general, northeastern and central regions outperformed northwestern and southwestern regions. [Conclusion] All regions should increase investment in animal husbandry, strengthen regional cooperation, extend industrial chains, and promote coordinated high-quality development of animal husbandry nationwide.

Key words: animal husbandry, high-quality development, entropy-weighted TOPSIS model, evaluation index system

中图分类号: