有机物添加对河套灌区碱化土壤理化性质与有机碳密度的影响

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2021.03.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】提高河套灌区碱化土壤有机碳含量、耕作层土壤的保水保肥能力和土地可持续生产能力。【方法】以河套灌区轻度碱化土壤为研究对象,于2019—2020年通过田间定位试验,设置生物炭添加、牛粪添加、羊粪添加、玉米秸秆添加和常规施肥（对照）5个处理,以春季秸秆全量还田为基准,即有机碳量为2 400 kg/hm²添加,对0~60 cm土层土壤理化性质和有机碳密度进行分析。【结果】生物炭处理与对照相比,0~30 cm土层的pH值下降4.4%、碱化度下降0.4%、有机碳密度提高30.9%;30~60 cm土层的pH值下降2.3%。牛粪处理与对照相比,0~30 cm土层的速效钾含量提高45.2%、全氮含量提高38.0%、>2 mm和0.25~2 mm的水稳性团聚体增加158.05%和81.51%、有机碳密度提高52.4%;30~60 cm土层的速效钾含量提高35.6%、速效磷含量提高41.7%。羊粪处理与对照相比,0~30 cm土层的全氮含量提高30.0%、>2 mm的水稳性团聚体增加357.45%;30~60 cm土层的速效磷含量提高39.1%。秸秆处理与对照相比,0~30 cm土层>2 mm和0.25~2 mm的水稳性团聚体增加77.62%和83.01%。【结论】不同有机物对河套灌区轻度碱化土壤的理化性质发挥着不同程度的作用。生物炭添加对土壤盐碱性改良效果较好;牛粪和羊粪添加对土壤理化性质及土壤养分的补充效果较好,而牛粪实际施用成本及施用对土壤理化性质的改善和有机碳库的补充综合效果最好,利于土地保水保肥和持续生产,值得在河套灌区进行推广。

关键词: 河套灌区, 有机物, 碱化土壤, 理化性质, 有机碳密度

Abstract: 【Objective】 To improve the organic carbon content of alkalinized soil,and the ability of water and fertilizer conservation in cultivated soil and sustainability of land-use in Hetao Irrigation Area.【Methods】 Taking the lightly alkalinized soil in Hetao Irrigation Area as the research object,five treatments including addition of biochar,addition of cow manure,addition of sheep manure,addition of corn straw and conventional fertilization（control）were set up in the field positioning experiment from 2019 to 2020. The total amount of straw returned to the field in spring was taken as the benchmark,that is,the amount of organic carbon was 2 400 kg/hm². The physicochemical properties and organic carbon density of 0-60 cm soil layer were analyzed.【Results】 Compared with the control group,the pH value of the 0-30 cm soil layer was decreased by 4.4%,the alkalinization degree was decreased by 0.4%,the organic carbon density was increased by 30.9%;and the pH value of 30-60 cm soil layer decreased by 2.3% treated with addition of biochar. Compared with the control group,the available potassium content in 0-30 cm soil layer was increased by 45.2%,the total nitrogen content was increased by 38.0%,the water-stable aggregates larger than 2 mm and 0.25-2 mm were increased by 158.05% and 81.51%,the organic carbon density was increased by 52.4%;and the content of available potassium and available phosphorus in 30-60 cm soil layer was increased by 35.6% and 41.7% respectively treated with addition of cow manure. Compared with the control group,the total nitrogen content in 0-30 cm soil layer was increased by 30.0%,and the water-stable aggregates larger than 2 mm was increased by 357.45%;and the content of available phosphorus in 30-60 cm soil layer was increased by 39.1% treated with addition of sheep manure. Compared with the control group,the water-stable aggregates larger than 2 mm and 0.25-2 mm in 0-30 cm soil layer were increased by 77.62% and 83.01% treated with addition of corn straw.【Conclusion】 Different organic matter had different effects on the physicochemical properties of the slightly alkaliznied soil in Hetao Irrigation Area. The addition of biochar had a good effect on soil salinity and alkalinity improvement. The effect of addition of cow manure and sheep manure on soil physicochemical properties and soil nutrients was better,while the comprehensive effect of applying cow manure on soil physicochemical properties and organic carbon pool was the best,which was conducive to soil water and fertilizer conservation and sustainable production in Hetao Irrigation Area.

Key words: Hetao Irrigation Area, Organic materials, Alkalinized soil, Physicochemical properties, Organic carbon density

中图分类号:

S562

温馨, 红梅, 张月鲜, 裴志福, 赵卉鑫, 陈晨. 有机物添加对河套灌区碱化土壤理化性质与有机碳密度的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2021, 49(3): 48-56.

WEN Xin, Hongmei, ZHANG Yuexian, PEI Zhifu, ZHAO Huixin, CHEN Chen. Effects of organic matter addition on the physicochemical properties and organic carbon density of alkalinized soil in Hetao Irrigation Area[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2021, 49(3): 48-56.

参考文献

[1] ZHAO J X,DAI F Q,HE S J,et al.Spatiotemporal variation of soil organic carbon in the cultivated soil layer of dry land in the Southwestern Yunnan Plateau,China[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2017,14(12):2484-2497.
[2] BI H Y,MA J W,ZHENG W J,et al.Comparison of soil moisture in GLDAS model simulations and in situ observations over the Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Atmospheres,2016,121(6):2658-2678.
[3] 曹雪莹. 污染农田休耕修复中土壤镉有效性及肥力变化研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2019.
[4] 尚杰,耿增超,王月玲,等.施用生物炭对(土娄)土微生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(6):1142-1151.
[5] 陈温福,张伟明,孟军.农用生物炭研究进展与前景[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(16):3324-3333.
[6] 李娟,韩慧,常少刚,等.羊粪有机肥施用量对沙地甘蓝生长和产量及土壤化学性质的影响[J].上海农业学报,2019,35(6):97-101.
[7] REITER M S,REEVES D W,BURMESTER C H,et al.Cotton nitrogen management in a high-residue conservation system:cover crop fertilization[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,2008,72(5):1321-1329.
[8] 秦都林,王双磊,刘艳慧,等.滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田对土壤理化性质及棉花产量的影响[J].作物学报,2017,43(7):1030-1042.
[9] 高惠敏,王相平,屈忠义,等.不同改良剂对河套灌区土壤盐碱指标及作物产量的影响研究[J].土壤通报,2020,51(5):1172-1179.
[10] 何瑞成,吴景贵.有机物料对原生盐碱地土壤生物学性质的影响[J].土壤学报,2018,55(3):774-782.
[11] 马桂秀,林治安,李志杰,等.有机物与化肥配施改良盐碱耕地的效果研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2019(3):69-75.
[12] 王玥,李晓龙,杨涛.河套灌区盐碱化耕地改良技术模式[J].现代农业,2019(2):29.
[13] 岳燕,郭维娜,林启美,等.加入不同量生物质炭盐渍化土壤盐分淋洗的差异与特征[J].土壤学报,2014,51(4):914-919.
[14] WU S H,HE H J,INTHAPANYA X,et al.Role of biochar on composting of organic wastes and remediation of contaminated soils—a review[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2017,24(20):16560-16577.
[15] 夏璐,赵蕊,金海燕,等.生物炭对土壤理化性质及玉米生长影响的研究进展[J].天津农学院学报,2018,25(2):64-69.
[16] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,1999.
[17] 毛玉梅. 烟气脱硫石膏改良围垦滩涂盐碱土研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2016.
[18] 张新荣. 东北地区晚全新世泥炭沉积的植硅体气候指示意义研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2006.
[19] 田生昌,陈新会,马建军,等.种稻对周围旱地土壤盐分和土壤水分含量的影响[J].西北农业学报,2012,21(7):77-83.
[20] 史雅静,徐明,王振宇,等.蚯蚓对菇渣中纤维素和木质素生物转化的研究[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(5):1779-1785.
[21] 刘皓. 污泥堆肥去除苯并[a]芘及堆肥产品对铅污染土壤修复的影响[D].广州:华南理工大学,2019.
[22] 杨真,王宝山.中国盐碱地改良利用技术研究进展及未来趋势[J].水土保持,2014,2(1):1-11.
[23] 吴红,韩大勇,王健.“桃-鸡”种养结合模式对桃园土壤养分含量的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(11):277-280.
[24] 郭洁. 有机物料对酿酒葡萄园土壤改良培肥效应及合理施用技术研究[D].银川:宁夏大学,2013.
[25] 呼生春,呼李乐,王文举,等.不同有机酿热物对日光温室土壤环境、葡萄产量及品质的影响[J].果树学报,2016,33(9):1084-1091.
[26] 闵星星,马玉寿,李世雄,等.羊粪对青海草地早熟禾草地生产力和土壤养分的影响[J].草业科学,2014,31(6):1039-1044.
[27] 王兴,宋乃平,杨新国,等.羊粪归还对荒漠草原表层土壤碳氮的影响[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(5):6-10.
[28] 崔荣美,李儒,韩清芳,等.不同有机肥培肥对旱作农田土壤团聚体的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(11):124-132.
[29] 王秀娟,解占军,董环,等.秸秆还田对玉米产量和土壤团聚体组成及有机碳分布的影响[J].玉米科学,2018,26(1):108-115.
[30] SIX J,ELLIOTT E T,PAUSTIAN K.Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation:a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2000,32(14):2099-2103.
[31] 张华杰,陈为峰,宋富贵,等.盐碱地土壤养分的空间变异及合理取样密度研究[J].农业资源与环境学报,2016,33(2):120-126.
[32] 罗友进,陈霞,胡佳羽,等.沼肥灌施配合机械深松对柑橘园土壤团聚体组成、有机质含量及矿化特征的影响[J].核农学报,2021,35(3):697-703.
[33] 林洪羽,周明华,张博文,等.生物炭及秸秆长期施用对紫色土坡耕地土壤团聚体有机碳的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2020,28(1):96-103.
[34] 高鸣慧,李娜,彭靖,等.秸秆和生物炭还田对棕壤团聚体分布及有机碳含量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(11):1978-1986.
[35] 金慧,吴景贵,李江楠,等.有机肥对作物品质影响的研究进展[J].现代农业科技,2010(11):273-274.
[36] KEITH R,EDWARDS T P,HANA C,et al.Nutrient addition effects on carbon fluxes in wet grasslands with either organic or mineral soil[J].Wetlands,2015,35(1):55-68.
[37] KIRKBY C A,RICHARDSON A E,WADE L J,et al.Nutrient availability limits carbon sequestration in arable soils[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2014,68:402-409.
[38] 李伟群,张久明,迟凤琴,等.秸秆不同还田方式对土壤团聚体及有机碳含量的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2019(5):27-30.
[39] 李新华,郭洪海,朱振林,等.不同秸秆还田模式对土壤有机碳及其活性组分的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(9):130-135.