北方农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 66-71.doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.03.08

• 植物保护·园艺 • 上一篇    下一篇

2种茎叶除草剂防除鹰嘴豆田阔叶杂草效果分析

陈文晋1, 范雅芳1, 贺小勇1, 席先梅1, 孔庆全1, 贺有权2, 李航2, 郭利明2, 张利俊3, 胡瑞峰4   

  1. 1.内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院 植物保护研究所,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010031;
    2.丰镇市农牧和科技局,内蒙古 丰镇 012199;
    3.凉城县农牧和科技局,内蒙古 凉城 013750;
    4.察哈尔右翼中旗农牧和科技局,内蒙古 科布尔 013550
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-09 出版日期:2023-06-20 发布日期:2023-08-24
  • 通讯作者: 孔庆全(1964—),男,研究员,学士,主要从事食用豆栽培与育种研究工作。
  • 作者简介:陈文晋(1988—),女,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事食用豆栽培与育种研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院创新基金(2020CXJJNO8); 国家现代农业产业技术体系资助项目(CARS08-Z06)

Analysis on the effect of two foliar-applied herbicides on broad leaf weeds in chickpea field

CHEN Wenjin1, FAN Yafang1, HE Xiaoyong1, XI Xianmei1, KONG Qingquan1, HE Youquan2, LI Hang2, GUO Liming2, ZHANG Lijun3, HU Ruifeng4   

  1. 1. Plant Protection Institute,Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,China;
    2. Fengzhen Agricultural & Animal Husbandry,Science and Technology Bureau,Fengzhen 012199,China;
    3. Liangcheng Agricultural & Animal Husbandry,Science and Technology Bureau,Liangcheng 013750,China;
    4. Qahar Youyi Middle Banner Agricultural & Animal Husbandry,Science and Technology Bureau,Kebu′er 013550,China
  • Received:2023-03-09 Online:2023-06-20 Published:2023-08-24

摘要: 【目的】明确不同茎叶除草剂对鹰嘴豆生长的安全性和田间阔叶杂草的防效。【方法】设25%氟磺胺草醚AS(750、1 125、1 500 mL/hm2)和480 g/L灭草松AS(2 250 、3 000、4 500 mL/hm2)各3个处理,以清水处理(CK1)和人工除草(CK2)为对照,随机区组排列,施药后调查分析2种茎叶除草剂不同施药量对鹰嘴豆生长、产量和百粒重的影响及对阔叶杂草的防效。【结果】25%氟磺胺草醚AS在3个施药剂量下对鹰嘴豆安全,总杂草防效1 500 mL/hm2>1 125 mL/hm2>750 mL/hm2,1 500 mL/hm2处理对阔叶杂草的株防效可达90%以上,鲜重防效达96.39%。施用480 g/L灭草松AS后,4 500 mL/hm2施药区药害严重,7 d后80%鹰嘴豆植株死亡;3 000 mL/hm2和2 250 mL/hm2施药区鹰嘴豆有不同程度轻微药害,15 d后全部恢复正常生长,但产量和百粒重大幅下降,与CK1相比有极显著差异(P<0.01),安全性差。【结论】25%氟磺胺草醚AS 1 500 mL/hm2剂量均匀喷雾在茎叶上可有效防除鹰嘴豆田阔叶杂草;480 g/L灭草松AS在试验剂量下对鹰嘴豆不安全,不宜在鹰嘴豆田使用。

关键词: 茎叶除草剂, 鹰嘴豆, 阔叶杂草, 防效, 安全性

Abstract: 【Objective】To determine the safety on the growth of chickpea and the control efficacy on broad leaf weeds of different foliar-applied herbicides.【Methods】Treatments of 25% fomesafen AS(750,1 125,1 500 mL/hm2)and 480 g/L bentazone AS(2 250,3 000,4 500 mL/hm2) were set up,with water treatment(CK1) and artificial weeding(CK2) as control. In randomized block arrangement the effects of different application rates of the two foliar-applied herbicides on the growth,yield,and 100-grain weight of chickpea,as well as the control efficacy on broad leaf weeds were analyzed after treatment.【Results】25% fomesafen AS was safe for chickpea at all three doses. The total weed control efficacy was 1 500 mL/hm2>1 125 mL/hm2>750 mL/hm2. The plant control efficacy of 1 500 mL/hm2 treatment on broad leaf weeds were over 90%,and the fresh weight control efficacy were 96.39%. After applying 480 g/L bentazone AS,the pesticide damage in the 4 500 mL/hm2 application area was serious,and 80% of chickpea plants died after 7 d. Chickpeas in the 3 000 mL/hm2 and 2 250 mL/hm2 application areas had different degrees of slight pesticide damage and returned to normal growth after 15 d. However the yield and 100 grain weight decreased greatly,extremely significantly different compared to the CK1 with poor safety.【Conclusion】25% fomesafen AS 1 500 mL/hm2 uniform sprayed on stem and leaf could effectively control broad leaf weeds in chickpea field. 480 g/L bentazone AS was not safe for chickpea at the experimental dose and was not suitable for chickpeas field.

Key words: Foliar-applied herbicide, Chickpea, Broad leaf weeds, Control efficacy, Safety

中图分类号: 

  • S482.4