滴灌条件下诱抗剂对向日葵列当田间防治效果的研究

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2024.03.15

北方农业学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 128-134.doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2024.03.15

• 植物保护•园艺 • 上一篇

滴灌条件下诱抗剂对向日葵列当田间防治效果的研究

段锐¹, 石胜华², 杨旭¹, 包婷婷¹, 李昊宇², 刘志达¹, 张宇宽¹, 张之为¹, 杜磊³, 赵君¹

1.内蒙古农业大学园艺与植物保护学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010018;
2.巴彦淖尔市现代农牧事业发展中心,内蒙古临河 015000;
3.内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院植物保护研究所,内蒙古呼和浩特 010031

收稿日期:2024-05-16 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-09-13
通讯作者: 赵君（1969—）,女,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事向日葵病理研究工作。
作者简介:段锐（1994—）,女,硕士,主要从事向日葵列当的研究工作。
基金资助:
财政部和农业农村部：国家特色油料产业技术体系（CARS-14）; 内蒙古自治区科技攻关项目（2021GG0149）; 内蒙古自治区直属高校基本科研业务费团队项目（BR22-13-09）

Study on the field prevention and control effects of inducer against sunflower broomrape under drip irrigation condition

DUAN Rui¹, SHI Shenghua², YANG Xu¹, BAO Tingting¹, LI Haoyu², LIU Zhida¹, ZHANG Yukuan¹, ZHANG Zhiwei¹, DU Lei³, ZHAO Jun¹

1. College of Horticulture and Plant Protection,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010018,China;
2. The Modern Agronomy and Animal Husbandry Developmental Center of Bayannur,Linhe 015000,China;
3. Institute of Plant Protection,Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,China

Received:2024-05-16 Online:2024-06-20 Published:2024-09-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探究施用植物诱抗剂对田间向日葵列当的防治效果,为综合防控列当提供新思路。【方法】利用滴灌系统田间施用锦苗标靶、甲壳素枯草芽孢杆菌、锦苗标靶与甲壳素枯草芽孢杆菌混合及清水（CK）,在4个不同调查时间点（7月20日、8月10日、8月15日、9月30日）调查内蒙古乌兰察布市四子王旗、包头市固阳县的向日葵列当寄生率和寄生程度,研究两种植物诱抗剂对列当寄生向日葵生产指标和产量的影响。【结果】滴灌锦苗标靶,两地向日葵列当寄生程度与CK相比均显著降低（P<0.05）,分别降低2.95、6.27、3.97与1.11、4.99、4.08;两地向日葵株高和产量均显著增加（P<0.05）,株高分别增加39.15、36.97、20.66、22.50 cm,产量分别增加892.80、984.00 kg/hm²。滴灌甲壳素枯草芽孢杆菌,列当寄生程度在不同调查时间点与CK相比都显著增加（P<0.05）,两地寄生程度分别增加5.71、3.77、1.91与1.36、14.12、13.03,向日葵各项生长指标与CK相比无显著差异（P>0.05）。锦苗标靶与甲壳素枯草芽孢杆菌混合滴灌,两地列当寄生率和寄生程度与CK相比均显著降低（P<0.05）,寄生率分别降低79.60%、31.80%、19.00%与36.67%、81.00%、35.67%,寄生程度分别降低7.25%、9.69%、8.80%与1.33%、6.01%、5.61%;向日葵株高、花盘直径和产量与CK相比均显著增加（P<0.05）,株高分别增加23.08、33.49与14.08、11.33 cm,花盘直径分别增加6.18、4.44 cm,产量分别增加796.80、835.20 kg/hm²。【结论】锦苗标靶和滴灌相结合能够作为一项措施整合到向日葵列当绿色防控技术体系中对列当进行有效防控。

关键词: 向日葵列当, 滴灌, 植物诱抗剂, 田间防治效果

Abstract: 【Objective】To investigate the prevention and control effect of plant inducible resistance agents on field sunflower broomrapes,and provide a new perspective for the comprehensive prevention and control of sunflower broomrapes.【Methods】The test sites were located in Siziwang Banner,Ulanqab City and Guyang County,Baotou City,Inner Mongolia. The parasitism rate and parasitism degree of sunflower broomrape were assessed at four different time points（20 th July,10 th August,15 th August,and 30 th September） using a drip irrigation system in the field. The treatments included jinmiao target,chitin and Bacillus subtilis,a combination of jinmiao target and chitin and Bacillus subtilis complex,and water as control（CK）. The effects of two plant inducible resistance agents on Orobanehe cumana parasitical sunflower growth indexes and yield were investigated. 【Results】After drip irrigation with jinmiao target alone,the parasitism degrees of sunflower broomrape in both test sites was significantly lower than that of CK（P<0.05）,which were reduced by 2.95,6.27,3.97 and 1.11,4.99,4.08. The plant height and yield of sunflower increased significantly in both sites（P<0.05）. The plant height was increased by 39.15,36.97,20.66 and 22.50 cm. The yield was increased by 892.80 and 984.00 kg/hm²,respectively. After only drip irrigation with chitin and B. subtilis,parasitism degrees increased significantly compared with CK at different time points（P<0.05）. The parasitism degrees of the two test sites increased by 5.71,3.77,1.91 and 1.36,14.12,13.03,respectively. There was no significant difference between CK and other sunflower growth indexes（P>0.05）. After a combination of jinmiao target and chitin and B. subtilis drip irrigation,parasitism rates and parasitism degrees were significantly reduced compared with CK. The parasitism rate decreased by 79.60%,31.80%,19.00% and 36.67%,81.00%,35.67%,respectively. Parasitism degree decreased by 7.25%,9.69%,8.80% and 1.33%,6.01%,5.61%,respectively. Plant height,disc diameter and yield of sunflower were significantly increased compared with CK（P<0.05）. The plant height was increased by 23.08,33.49 and 14.08,11.33 cm,respectively. The disc diameter was increased by 6.18 and 4.44 cm,respectively. The yield was increased by 796.80 and 835.20 kg/hm²,respectively.【Conclusion】The combination of jiaomiao target and drip irrigation can be integrated into the green prevention and control technology system of sunflower broomrapes for effective prevention and control.

Key words: Sunflower broomrape, Drip irrigation, Plant inducible resistance agents, Field prevention and control effect

中图分类号:

S435.655

段锐, 石胜华, 杨旭, 包婷婷, 李昊宇, 刘志达, 张宇宽, 张之为, 杜磊, 赵君. 滴灌条件下诱抗剂对向日葵列当田间防治效果的研究[J]. 北方农业学报, 2024, 52(3): 128-134.

DUAN Rui, SHI Shenghua, YANG Xu, BAO Tingting, LI Haoyu, LIU Zhida, ZHANG Yukuan, ZHANG Zhiwei, DU Lei, ZHAO Jun. Study on the field prevention and control effects of inducer against sunflower broomrape under drip irrigation condition[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2024, 52(3): 128-134.

参考文献

[1] SHI B X,ZHAO J.Recent progress on sunflower broomrape research in China[J].Oilseeds and Fats Crops and Lipids,2020,27:30.
[2] 王靖,崔超,李亚珍,等.全寄生杂草向日葵列当研究现状与展望[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(5):144-147.
[3] DOR E,PLAKHINE D,JOEL D M,et al.A new race of sunflower broomrape(Orobanche cumana)with a wider host range due to changes in seed response to strigolactones[J].Weed Science,2020,68(2):134-142.
[4] YOSHIDA S,SHIRASU K.Plants that attack plants:Molecular elucidation of plant parasitism[J].Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2012,15(6):708-713.
[5] 吴海荣,强胜.检疫杂草列当(Orobanche L.)[J].杂草科学,2006,24(2):58-60.
[6] 石胜华,柳惠卿,云晓鹏,等.向日葵抗列当水平室内鉴定体系准确性评价及不同品种抗列当水平鉴定[J].杂草学报,2019,37(2):28-34.
[7] 白全江,云晓鹏,高占明,等.内蒙古向日葵列当发生危害及其防治技术措施[J].内蒙古农业科技,2013(1):75-76.
[8] 庞俊峰,马德宁,王德寿,等.向日葵列当生物学特性及抗列当向日葵分子育种研究进展[J].生物技术进展,2012,2(6):391-396.
[9] 云晓鹏,杜磊,白全江,等.植物诱抗剂-IR-18对向日葵列当的抑制效果及应用[J].北方农业学报,2018,46(6):77-82.
[10] 李欢欢. 布尔津县向日葵列当发生规律与预防措施[J].新疆农业科技,2017(3):48.
[11] SLAVOV S,VAN ONCKELEN H,BATCHVAROVA R,et al.IAA production during germination of Orobanche spp. seeds[J].Journal of Plant Physiology,2004,161(7):847-853.
[12] 白全江,云晓鹏,杜磊,等.抗除草剂新品种防除向日葵列当用药技术研究[J].北方农业学报,2018,46(4):77-81.
[13] 陶波,赵旭,杜磊,等.诱抗剂对向日葵抗性诱导的研究[J].北方农业学报,2022,50(3):53-59.
[14] 杨旭,高婧,石必显,等.室内条件下锦苗标靶对番茄埃及列当的防效[J].杂草学报,2023,41(2):49-56.
[15] 付思蕊,王胤,陈雅奇,等.不同植物免疫诱抗剂对番茄的诱抗促生作用研究[J].蔬菜,2023(2):43-48.
[16] 崔华星,王宁,侯敏,等.枯草芽孢杆菌DNKAS对加工番茄分枝列当的防治应用[J].中国农业科技导报,2020,22(12):105-114.
[17] BARGHOUTHI S,SALMAN M.Bacterial inhibition of Orobanche aegyptiaca and Orobanche cernua radical elongation[J].Biocontrol Science and Technology,2010,20(4):423-435.
[18] 王亚娇,纪莉景,栗秋生,等.多功能列当生防镰刀菌的筛选及种类鉴定[J].中国生物防治学报,2016,32(6):788-793.
[19] 张萍,赵建华,鞠召彬,等.放线菌肥对新疆加工番茄促生、防病增产及列当的防控效果[J].中国蔬菜,2019(2):49-52.
[20] 李智强,姚虞,杨洋,等.“神锄”复合微生物菌肥防治烤烟列当田间试验[J].新农业,2016(7):58-59.
[21] 唐玉清,殷允广.土壤调理剂与微生物功能菌配合施用修复土壤、生物防治列当试验结果与分析[J].新疆农业科技,2015(3):52-54.
[22] 柳慧卿,石胜华,王娜,等.室内条件下氨基酸水溶肥锦苗标靶抑制列当寄生向日葵的研究[J].杂草学报,2019,37(3):53-59.
[23] 侯丽琴,李长松,徐作珽,等.甲壳素诱导黄瓜抗霜霉病初步研究[J].山东农业科学,2011(8):81-83.
[24] 鲁述玲,杨建平.生物菌剂对向日葵列当的抑制效果[J].农村科技,2020(5):27-30.
[25] 崔华星,许俊锋,崔卫东,等.枯草芽孢杆菌DNKAS对分枝列当的防效、安全性及作用机理[J].西北农业学报,2022,31(1):117-122.

滴灌条件下诱抗剂对向日葵列当田间防治效果的研究

Study on the field prevention and control effects of inducer against sunflower broomrape under drip irrigation condition

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	郝琪, 梁红伟, 王永强, 王富贵, 陈天陆, 王振, 白岚方, 王志刚. 基于临界氮浓度稀释曲线的内蒙古土默川平原滴灌玉米氮营养诊断[J]. 北方农业学报, 2024, 52(3): 1-18.
[2]	韩云飞, 任永峰, 赵沛义, 杜二小, 赵志媛, 张娜, 刘小月, 张鹏, 苗新岳. 不同滴灌处理对藜麦生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2024, 52(1): 103-111.
[3]	刘小月, 任永峰, 赵志媛, 张娜, 苗新岳, 张舒, 韩云飞, 张鹏, 赵沛义. 滴灌对内蒙古阴山北麓藜麦水分利用及产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(4): 56-63.
[4]	陶波, 赵旭, 杜磊, 云晓鹏. 诱抗剂对向日葵抗性诱导的研究[J]. 北方农业学报, 2022, 50(3): 53-59.
[5]	苏雅杰, 田晓燕, 杜磊, 白全江, 刘志达, 赵君, 徐嘉俐, 段小军, 武占敏, 云晓鹏. 巴彦淖尔市向日葵列当诱捕作物的筛选[J]. 北方农业学报, 2022, 50(2): 103-109.
[6]	苏雅杰, 杜磊, 云晓鹏, 白全江, 田晓燕, 葛童, 杜超. 巴彦淖尔市黄灌区秋浇地水浸越冬对向日葵列当种子萌发的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2020, 48(4): 100-104.
[7]	今芝, 陈瑞英, 乌兰, 关婷, 赵培荣, 贾立国, 吴云霞. 不同节水模式对阴山北麓马铃薯干物质积累、产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2020, 48(3): 60-66.
[8]	任永峰, 路战远, 聂晶, 崔艳, 安昊, 高宇, 赵沛义. 苗前滴灌对马铃薯水分利用和产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2019, 47(4): 66-72.
[9]	徐冰;田德龙;李泽坤;任杰;汤鹏程. 河套灌区淖尔水滴灌调蓄能力及发展方式分析[J]. 北方农业学报, 2018, 46(6): 44-49.
[10]	赵娜;冯君伟;李晓红;王子敬;马俊;刘汉江;郝云凤. 不同滴灌专用肥对河套灌区玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2018, 46(6): 58-63.
[11]	云晓鹏;杜磊;白全江;孙涛;田晓燕;苏雅杰;张光. 植物诱抗剂-IR-18对向日葵列当的抑制效果及应用[J]. 北方农业学报, 2018, 46(6): 77-82.
[12]	白全江;云晓鹏;杜磊;温埃清;李军;苏雅杰;杜超;葛童. 抗除草剂新品种防除向日葵列当用药技术研究[J]. 北方农业学报, 2018, 46(4): 77-77.
[13]	李金琴;王宇飞;侯旭光;李媛媛;陈杰辉;李雪峰;吕岩. 不同节水种植模式对玉米产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2017, 45(4): 30-30.
[14]	郭富强;程满金;马兰忠;李博. 内蒙古新增“四个千万亩”节水灌溉工程效益分析[J]. 北方农业学报, 2017, 45(3): 62-62.
[15]	刘富强李文刚刘羽郝文胜昊翔李树生张智芳石晓华马丽荣雷利君周彦波高峰曹春梅谢锐韩志刚. 马铃薯滴灌机械化节本增效规模生产技术试验与示范[J]. 北方农业学报, 2017, 45(2): 66-66.