不同燕麦品种抗蚜性鉴定及其生产性能综合评价

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2022.06.10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】筛选抗蚜等级高、生产性能强、综合表现优异的燕麦品种，为内蒙古燕麦产业的健康发展提供理论参考。【方法】在呼和浩特市土默特左旗中国农业科学院草原研究所沙尔沁农牧交错区试验基地，以17个燕麦品种为供试材料，采用蚜量比值法进行田间抗蚜性鉴定，并确定各品种的抗蚜等级，以农艺性状和产量为指标比较品种间生产性能的差异，以农艺性状、产量和蚜量比值为指标开展双变量相关性分析和系统聚类分析。【结果】供试燕麦品种的抗蚜性共分为6个等级，白燕7号、蒙燕3号、青海444、青引2号表现为高抗；青海甜燕麦和青燕1号表现为中抗；蒙饲燕2号、领袖、贝勒、太阳神和黄燕麦表现为低抗；坝燕1号、坝燕7号表现为低感；坝燕5号表现为中感；爱沃126、燕王和福瑞至表现为高感。白燕7号、太阳神株高可达1.18 m以上，显著高于坝燕7号、领袖、燕王、青引2号、爱沃126、福瑞至（P<0.05）；贝勒鲜草产量最高（4.34 kg/m²），且显著高于除坝燕5号、爱沃126外的其他品种（P<0.05）；太阳神干草产量最高（1.69 kg/m²），显著高于坝燕7号和青引2号（P<0.05）；17个燕麦品种的鲜干比无显著差异（P>0.05），爱沃126鲜干比最高（2.98），青海444鲜干比最低（1.86）。聚类分析结果显示，不同燕麦品种蚜量比值、株高和产量表现存在差异；第Ⅰ类燕麦品种（青海甜燕麦、蒙燕3号、青海444、白燕7号、领袖、青燕1号、黄燕麦、太阳神、坝燕1号、坝燕5号、坝燕7号、蒙饲燕2号）综合表现强。【结论】青海甜燕麦、蒙燕3号、青海444、白燕7号、领袖、青燕1号、黄燕麦、太阳神、坝燕1号、坝燕5号、坝燕7号、蒙饲燕2号抗蚜性强、生产性能较好、综合表现优异，适宜在内蒙古土默特左旗种植。

关键词: 燕麦, 品种, 抗蚜性, 生产性能

Abstract:

【Objective】To select oat varieties with high aphid resistance，strong production performance and excellent comprehensive performance，to provide theoretical references for the healthy development of the oat industry in Inner Mongolia.【Methods】In Shaerqin farming-pastoral test site of Institute of Grassland Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Tumed Left Banner，Hohhot，taking 17 oat varieties as test materials，the aphid resistance was identified by aphid ratio method. The aphid resistance grade of each variety was determined. And the agronomic traits and yield were used as indicators to compare the differences in production performance of the varieties. Bivariate correlation analysis and systematic cluster analysis were performed using agronomic parameters, yield, and aphid ratio as indicators.【Results】The aphid resistance of the test oat varieties was categorized into 6 grades. Baiyan No.7，Mengyan No.3，Qinghai 444，and Qingyin No.2 had high resistance. Qinghaitian oats and Qingyan No.1 showed medium resistance. Mengsiyan No.2，Lingxiu，Beile，Taiyangshen，and Yellow Oats had low resistance. Bayan No.1 and Bayan No.7 were low susceptible. Bayan No.5 was medium susceptible. Aiwo126，Yanwang and Furuizhi were highly susceptible. The plant height of Baiyan No.7 and Taiyangshen reached over 1.18 m，which was significantly higher than that of Bayan No.7，Lingxiu，Yanwang，Qingyin No.2，Aiwo 126，Furuizhi（P<0.05）. Beile had the highest fresh grass yield （4.34 kg/m²），which was significantly higher（P<0.05） than other varieties except Bayan No.5 and Aiwo 126. Taiyangshen had the highest hay yield（1.69 kg/m²），which was significantly higher（P<0.05）than that of Bayan No.7 and Qingyin No.2. There was no significant difference（P>0.05）in the fresh-to-dry ratio of the 17 oat varieties. Aiwo 126 had the highest（2.98） fresh-to-dry ratio，while Qinghai 444 had the lowest（1.86）. The results of cluster analysis showed that the aphid ratio，plant height and yield performance of different oat varieties varied. The comprehensive performance of class I oat varieties（Qinghaitian oats，Mengyan No.3，Qinghai 444，Baiyan No.7，Lingxiu，Qingyan No.1，Yellow Oats，Taiyangshen，Bayan No.1，Bayan No.5，Bayan No.7，and Mengsiyan No.2） was stronger.【Conclusion】Qinghaitian oats，Mengyan No.3，Qinghai 444，Baiyan No.7，Lingxiu，Qingyan No.1，Yellow Oats，Taiyangshen，Bayan No.1，Bayan No.5，Bayan No.7 and Mengsiyan No.2 had strong aphid resistance，good production performance，and excellent comprehensive performance.They were suitable for planting in Tumed Left Banner in Inner Mongolia.

Key words: Oats, Variety, Aphid resistant, Production performance

中图分类号:

S512.6

王亚萍, 徐林波, 王兰, 林克剑, 崔进, 张权益. 不同燕麦品种抗蚜性鉴定及其生产性能综合评价[J]. 北方农业学报, 2022, 50(6): 72-79.

WANG Yaping, XU Linbo, WANG Lan, LIN Kejian, CUI Jin, ZHANG Quanyi. Identification of aphid resistance of different oat varieties and comprehensive evaluation of the production performance[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2022, 50(6): 72-79.

图/表 6

表1

表2

表3

图1

表4

图2

参考文献 32

[1]	颜显明, 闵爱英, 张耀儒. 高寒地区引种燕麦的熟性及其栽培技术的研究[J]. 中国草地, 1992(5):47-50.
[2]	付鸾鸿, 于崧, 于立河, 等. 不同基因型燕麦萌发期耐盐碱性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(6):27-35.
[3]	叶雪玲, 甘圳, 万燕, 等. 饲用燕麦育种研究进展与展望[J/OL]. 草业学报, 2022:1-18.(2022-10-18). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1105.S.20221017.1723.032.html.
[4]	杨益众, 林冠伦, 胡长富. 麦蚜为害对小麦品质和产量的影响及其防治指标的初步研究[J]. 植物保护学报, 1992, 19(2):152.
[5]	王军, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 等. 33份燕麦种质田间抗蚜性和抗大麦黄矮病毒评价[J]. 草业科学, 2019, 36(12):3155-3165.
[6]	徐昭焕, 程登发, 孙京瑞, 等. 小麦品种(系)对不同地理种群荻草谷网蚜的抗性[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2012, 49(3):729-734.
[7]	FOOTT W H, TIMMINS P R. Effects of infestations by the corn leaf aphid,Rhopalosipum maidis(Homoptera:Aphididae),on field corn in Southwestern Ontario[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1973, 105(3):449-458. doi: 10.4039/Ent105449-3
[8]	马建华, 王颖, 闫雅, 等. 宁夏燕麦主要虫害发生种类、规律及危害研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2020, 61(12):46-47.
[9]	JIMÉNEZ-MARTÍNEZ E S, BOSQUE-PÉREZ N A, BERGER P H, et al. Life history of the bird cherry-oat aphid,Rhopalosipum padi(Homoptera:Aphididae),on Transgenic and untransformed wheat challenged with Barley yellow dwarf virus[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2004, 97(2):203-212. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-97.2.203
[10]	胡凯军. 抗红叶病燕麦种质评价与筛选[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2010.
[11]	郭成, 王艳, 张新瑞, 等. 燕麦种质抗坚黑穗病鉴定与评价[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2):379-386. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.02.023
[12]	聂秀美, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 等. 红叶病在燕麦不同生育时期的发生情况及对种子产量的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(3):136-141.
[13]	王军, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 等. 大麦黄矮病毒侵染对燕麦光合及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4):923-931. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.04.008
[14]	陈新, 吴斌, 张宗文. 燕麦种质资源重要农艺性状适应性和稳定性评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(4):577-585.
[15]	郑殿升, 张宗文. 中国燕麦种质资源国外引种与利用[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(6):1001-1005.
[16]	孙建平, 董宽虎, 蒯晓妍, 等. 晋北农牧交错区引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲用价值比较[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(11):222-230.
[17]	中华人民共和国农业部. 小麦蚜虫测报调查规范:NY/T 612—2002[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.
[18]	中华人民共和国农业部. 小麦抗病虫性评价技术规范第 7 部分小麦抗蚜虫评价技术规范:NY/T 1443.7—2007 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[19]	PAINTER R H. Resistance of plants to insects[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1958, 3(1):267-290. doi: 10.1146/ento.1958.3.issue-1
[20]	王颖, 马晓霞, 魏淑花, 等. 宁夏灌区不同燕麦品种抗蚜性鉴定[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2019, 60(11):33-34.
[21]	吴廷娟, 贺春贵, 武德功, 等. 不同燕麦品种对蚜虫的抗性比较试验[J]. 草原与草坪, 2007(3):38-40.
[22]	朱永峰, 陈明, 刘长仲. 蚜虫为害对五个燕麦品种苗期体内几种物质的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2011, 37(2):55-58.
[23]	GEBRETSADIK K G, ZHANG Y, CHEN J L. Screening and evaluation for antibiosis resistance of the spring wheat accessions to the grain aphid,Sitobion miscanthi(Takahashi)(Hemiptera:Aphididae)[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(8):2329-2344. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63716-4
[24]	王娟, 李荫藩, 梁秀芝, 等. 北方主栽燕麦品种种质资源形态多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017(4):27-32.
[25]	何振富, 贺春贵, 王斐, 等. 不同类型饲草高粱生产性能与饲用品质的差异分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7):1446-1453. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.07.009
[26]	吴海艳, 曲尼, 曲珍, 等. 6个燕麦品种在昂仁县的生产性能及饲草品质比较[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(4):72-80.
[27]	娜日苏, 梁庆伟, 杨秀芳, 等. 13个燕麦品种在科尔沁沙地的生产性能评价[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2018(17):136-141.
[28]	KADAM S S, SOLANKI N S, ARIF M, et al. Productivity and quality of fodder oats(Avena sativa L.) as influenced by sowing time,cutting schedules and nitrogen levels[J]. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 36(2):179-186. doi: 10.5958/2231-6744.2019.00030.6
[29]	徐远东, 朱瑞芬, 冉启凡, 等. 19份燕麦品种(系)在重庆地区的生产性能与饲用价值综合评价[J/OL]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(19):109-113.(2022-10-19). http//kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1105.S.20221017.1723.032.html.
[30]	张尚雄, 荆照, 吴菲菲, 等. 21份引进BMR饲草高粱不育系的农艺性状和SRAP遗传多样性[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5):1072-1079.
[31]	吕玉峰, 王宇欣, 薛志强, 等. 基于农艺性状与品质性状对40份裸燕麦种质资源综合分析[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 42(3):54-63.
[32]	王腾飞, 常怡然, 邓雪, 等. 饲用燕麦品种在宁夏雨养区的适应性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7):1755-1762. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.07.017