秸秆深翻还田对盐碱化土壤玉米根系形态特征及产量的影响

doi:10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.01.01

北方农业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 1-15.doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.01.01

• 作物栽培 • 下一篇

秸秆深翻还田对盐碱化土壤玉米根系形态特征及产量的影响

张皓^1,2, 高聚林^1,2, 于晓芳^1,2, 马达灵^1,2, 胡树平^2,3

1.内蒙古农业大学农学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010019;
2.内蒙古自治区作物栽培与遗传改良重点实验室,内蒙古呼和浩特 010019;
3.内蒙古农业大学职业技术学院,内蒙古包头 014109

收稿日期:2022-12-27 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-05-22
通讯作者: 高聚林（1964—）,男,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事玉米栽培与生理生态的研究工作。
作者简介:张皓（1997—）,男,硕士研究生,研究方向为玉米生理生态。
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区“科技兴蒙”行动重点专项（KJXM2020001-06）; 内蒙古作物栽培与遗传改良重点实验室项目（2021PT0004）; 国家玉米产业技术体系项目（CARS-02-50）

Effects of deep ploughing straw returning on root morphology and yield of maize in saline-alkali soil

ZHANG Hao^1,2, GAO Julin^1,2, YU Xiaofang^1,2, MA Daling^1,2, HU Shuping^2,3

1. Agricultural College,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010019,China;
2. Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Genetic Improvement,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,Hohhot 010019,China;
3. Vocational and Technical College,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Baotou 014109,China

Received:2022-12-27 Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-05-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】通过研究秸秆深翻还田下玉米根系的生长发育状况,明确耕作方式对不同程度盐碱化农田改良和玉米生长的影响。【方法】2021—2022年在轻度、中度和重度盐碱化土地上设置农户浅旋不还田（CK）和秸秆深翻还田（DPR）两种耕作方式,以当地主栽玉米品种迪卡159和九圣禾257为试验材料,分析不同处理对土壤理化性质、玉米根系生长状况和产量的影响。【结果】与CK相比,DPR土壤容重降低,含水量升高,碱解氮、全氮、速效磷、速效钾、有机质含量均显著增加（P<0.05）,土壤全盐量、pH值分别降低5.48%~48.98%和1.25%~13.71%;DPR玉米根长、根表面积、根平均直径和根体积均显著增加（P<0.05）,轻度盐碱化土壤玉米根系指标改善效果最为明显,增幅分别为62.13%、62.99%、26.46%和69.67%;玉米产量较CK提高14.08%~33.61%,中度盐碱化土壤的增幅最大。【结论】秸秆深翻还田可以有效改善土壤理化性质,降低土壤全盐量、pH值。随着全盐量的降低,玉米根长、根体积显著增加,从而增加根表面积,提高了玉米植株利用土壤养分的能力,最终使产量增加。

关键词: 盐碱地, 秸秆深翻还田, 玉米, 根系生长, 产量

Abstract: 【Objective】To elucidate the impacts of tillage methods on the development of saline-alkali farmland and maize growth by examining the growth and development of maize roots under deep ploughing straw returning.【Methods】From 2021 to 2022,two tillage methods,shallow rotation no returning（CK）and deep ploughing straw returning（DPR）,were set up on mild,moderate and severe saline-alkali land. The local main maize varieties DK159 and JSH257 were used as experimental materials to analyze the effects of different treatments on soil physical and chemical properties,maize root growth status and yield.【Results】Compared with CK,the bulk density in DPR soil decreased,water content increased,alkaline hydrolytic nitrogen,total N,available P,available K and organic matter content increased significantly（P<0.05）. The soil total salt content and pH value decreased by 5.48%-48.98% and 1.25%-13.71%,respectively. The root length,root surface area,average root diameter and root volume of DPR maize significantly increased（P<0.05）. The root indexes improved most in the mild saline-alkali soil,with increases of 62.13%,62.99%,26.46% and 69.67%,respectively. In comparison with the CK,the yield of maize increased by 14.08%-33.61% with the highest increase in moderate saline-alkali soil.【Conclusion】Deep ploughing straw returning effectively improved soil physical and chemical properties,reduced soil total salt content and pH value. With the decrease of total salt content,maize root length and root volume increased significantly,increasing root surface area,improving the ability of maize plants to utilize soil nutrients,and ultimately increasing yield.

Key words: Saline-alkali soil, Deep ploughing straw returning, Maize, Root growth, Yield

中图分类号:

S513

张皓, 高聚林, 于晓芳, 马达灵, 胡树平. 秸秆深翻还田对盐碱化土壤玉米根系形态特征及产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(1): 1-15.

ZHANG Hao, GAO Julin, YU Xiaofang, MA Daling, HU Shuping. Effects of deep ploughing straw returning on root morphology and yield of maize in saline-alkali soil[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2023, 51(1): 1-15.

参考文献

[1] UNGER P W.Straw-mulch rate effect on soil water storage and Sorghum yield[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1978,42(3):486-491.
[2] 李新举,张志国,刘勋岭,等.秸秆覆盖对土壤水盐运动的影响[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,31(1):38-40.
[3] DAVIES W J,ZHANG J H.Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1991,42:55-76.
[4] 田平,姜英,孙悦,等.不同还田方式对玉米秸秆腐解及土壤养分含量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2019,27(1):100-108.
[5] ZHANG P,WEI T,JIA Z K,et al.Effects of straw incorporation on soil organic matter and soil water-stable aggregates content in semiarid regions of Northwest China[J].PLoS One,2014,9(3):e92839.
[6] ZHANG P,CHEN X L,WEI T,et al.Effects of straw incorporation on the soil nutrient contents,enzyme activities,and crop yield in a semiarid region of China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,160:65-72.
[7] MU X Y,ZHAO Y L,LIU K,et al.Responses of soil properties,root growth and crop yield to tillage and crop residue management in a wheat—maize cropping system on the North China Plain[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2016,78:32-43.
[8] YOU D B,TIAN P,SUI P X,et al.Short-term effects of tillage and residue on spring maize yield through regulating root-shoot ratio in Northeast China[J].Scientific Reports,2017,7(1):1-11.
[9] 朱德峰,林贤青,曹卫星.水稻深层根系对生长和产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2001,34(4):429-432.
[10] GUO H C,YORK L M.Maize with fewer nodal roots allocates mass to more lateral and deep roots that improve nitrogen uptake and shoot growth[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2019,70(19):5299-5309.
[11] LI P C,PAN T,WANG H M,et al.Natural variation of ZmHKT1 affects root morphology in maize at the seedling stage[J].Planta,2019,249(3):879-889.
[12] 郝姗姗,宰学明.NaCl处理对竹柳苗根系活力及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2013,41(15):6587-6588.
[13] 谷娇娇. 盐胁迫对水稻氮代谢及产量的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2019.
[14] 王遵亲,祝寿泉,俞仁培,等.中国盐渍土[M].北京:科学出版社,1993.
[15] 俞仁培. 土壤碱化及其防治[J].土壤,1984,16(5):163-170.
[16] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[17] BENGOUGH A G,MCKENZIE B M,HALLETT P D,et al.Root elongation,water stress,and mechanical impedance:A review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2011,62(1):59-68.
[18] 马巍,侯立刚,齐春艳,等.吉林省盐碱稻区不同栽培模式对土壤性质及水稻生长的影响[J].吉林农业科学,2014,39(4):17-21.
[19] 沈婧丽,王彬,田小萍,等.不同改良模式对盐碱地土壤理化性质及水稻产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,32(2):338-344.
[20] 张今杰. 盐胁迫下玉米根系生理及膜脂代谢调控研究[D].大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2021.
[21] BURTON A L,LYNCH J P,BROWN K M.Spatial distribution and phenotypic variation in root cortical aerenchyma of maize(Zea mays L.)[J].Plant and Soil,2013,367(1):263-274.
[22] BIAN D H,JIA G P,CAI L J,et al.Effects of tillage practices on root characteristics and root lodging resistance of maize[J].Field Crops Research,2016,185:89-96.
[23] TAN D S,JIN J Y,HUANG S W,et al.Effect of long-term application of K fertilizer and wheat straw to soil on crop yield and soil K under different planting systems[J].Agricultural Sciences in China,2007,6(2):200-207.
[24] LI R,TAO R,LING N,et al.Chemical,organic and bio-fertilizer management practices effect on soil physicochemical property and antagonistic bacteria abundance of a cotton field:Implications for soil biological quality[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2017,167:30-38.
[25] NEUMANN G,RÖMHELD V.Rhizosphere chemistry in relation to plant nutrition[M]∥Marschner′s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants.Amsterdam:Elsevier,2012:347-368.
[26] 战秀梅,李秀龙,韩晓日,等.深耕及秸秆还田对春玉米产量、花后碳氮积累及根系特征的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2012,43(4):461-466.
[27] 黄毅,毕素艳,邹洪涛,等.秸秆深层还田对玉米根系及产量的影响[J].玉米科学,2013,21(5):109-112.
[28] 于梅婷. 深松和秸秆还田对玉米生长发育和养分吸收的影响[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.
[29] REN B Z,LI X,DONG S T,et al.Soil physical properties and maize root growth under different tillage systems in the North China Plain[J].The Crop Journal,2018,6(6):669-676.
[30] 槐圣昌. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对东北黑土物理性质和玉米根系生长的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2020.
[31] CAI H G,MA W,ZHANG X Z,et al.Effect of subsoil tillage depth on nutrient accumulation,root distribution,and grain yield in spring maize[J].The Crop Journal,2014,2(5):297-307.
[32] 白建芳. 不同耕作方式对高产春玉米冠根衰老的影响[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012.

秸秆深翻还田对盐碱化土壤玉米根系形态特征及产量的影响

Effects of deep ploughing straw returning on root morphology and yield of maize in saline-alkali soil

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	杜二小, 李焕春, 任永峰, 康文钦, 郑娜, 白红梅, 赵逸雯, 赵沛义. 氮肥减施与替代对马铃薯农田土壤理化性状及产量品质的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(6): 10-17.
[2]	韩超, 常春元, 张江鹏, 吴素芬, 李欣欣. 发酵菌糠和发酵玉米芯用于叶菜育苗基质的研究[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(6): 70-79.
[3]	王光杰, 黄彬香, 宋尧, 闵矿楠, 李顺澳, 高日平, 赵熙玲, 王靖, 任永峰. 半干旱风沙区玉米关键需水期叶气温差变化特征及影响因素[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(6): 89-97.
[4]	王帮太, 杨美丽, 郭华, 王静, 王志红, 鹿红卫, 程建梅, 秦贵文, 陈甲法. 玉米茎秆营养品质性状全基因组关联分析及候选基因筛选[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(5): 1-22.
[5]	唐兰, 吴元奇. 玉米矮秆基因及调控机理的研究进展[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(5): 23-30.
[6]	李保成, 康文钦, 任永峰, 张德健, 李娟, 张向前, 赵志媛, 韩云飞, 张乐, 伞薪潼. 干旱对不同马铃薯品种生长和产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(5): 40-50.
[7]	靖相柱, 孙霞, 郭业民, 赵文苹, 郭榛, 桑茂盛. 光谱成像技术在玉米种子质量检测方面的研究进展[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(5): 93-102.
[8]	赵丽, 范铭元, 谢广明, 陆靖英, 张琪, 孙孝静, 郭虹霞, 邓妍, 王创云. 旱地不同春玉米品种光合特性、干物质积累及产量分析[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(4): 11-19.
[9]	潘丽杰, 张宝林, 李瑞鑫, 牛潘婷, 郭建鹏, 斯琴高娃, 何美玲. 玉米不同叶位叶片叶绿素含量垂直分布研究进展[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(4): 28-37.
[10]	张丽丽, 薛兵东, 樊叶, 莫姣娇, 赵新宇, 杨海龙, 付俊, 姜英, 齐华, 王璞. 辽东南地区酸性土壤连续施用调节剂对玉米生长发育及产量构成的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(4): 38-47.
[11]	于大伟, 李丽君, 李海东, 闫立伟, 黄硕, 赵铁锋, 李欣, 洪钟, 李小平, 郭永鹏. 施肥方式对谷子产量及产量性状的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(4): 48-55.
[12]	刘小月, 任永峰, 赵志媛, 张娜, 苗新岳, 张舒, 韩云飞, 张鹏, 赵沛义. 滴灌对内蒙古阴山北麓藜麦水分利用及产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(4): 56-63.
[13]	何子涵, 吴星霖, 向志宇, 白光红, 王洋, 李松壕, 杜振华, 孜比尔尼沙·赛买提, 戴小华. 玉米须生物活性成分、功效与提取方法的研究进展[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(4): 96-104.
[14]	赵莉, 何贤芳, 邓骋, 汪建来. 安徽省稻茬小麦产量差异解析[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(3): 1-11.
[15]	程志鹏, 张成泽, 王富贵, 王振, 张悦忠, 闫立伟, 梁红伟, 杨志红, 高聚林, 王志刚. 耕作方式对内蒙古旱作区土壤水热及玉米产量的影响[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(2): 22-32.